نظریه های اصلی نقد معماری در مغرب زمین: سیر تاریخی از سدۀ نوزدهم تا امروز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشکدة معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 استادیار دانشکدة معمارى و شهرسازى دانشگاه شهید بهشتى

چکیده

با اینکه در بحران کنونی نقد معماری پرداختن به مبانی و تئوری نقد معماری بیش از پیش ضرورت دارد، اما به مباحث نظری و تاریخی نقد معماری کمتر توجه شده است و مبانی نظری نقد معماری در غفلت و افول به سر می‌برد. در تاریخ ظهور نقد معماری آراء، نظر، و نظریه‌های گوناگونی دربارة نقد معماری مطرح شده که با تحولات آن‌ها جریان نقد معماری پرورده شده است. در این مقاله هدفْ پیگیری و تدقیق این جریان نظری و یافتن سیر تاریخی نظریه‌های اصلی در حوزة نقد معماری است. این سیر تاریخی را، که به روش تاریخ مفهومی و بررسی اسنادی محقق شده است، می‌توان در پنج دورة زمانی تقطیع کرد: اواخر سدة نوزدهم تا نیمة سدة بیستم که در این دوره پرسش از نقد مطبوعاتی و نقد آن آغاز شد و به‌موازات تحولات معماری در جنبش مدرن نگرش‌ها به نقد معماری نیز تغییر کرد؛ دهة 1960 که از یک سو، نظریة نقد هنجاری و اختصاصی نقد معماری مبتنی بر نظریة جنبش مدرن مطرح شد و از سوی دیگر، مبانی نقد معماری از مطالعات زبان‌شناختی و مطالعات طراحی اثر پذیرفت؛ دهة 1970 که تحلیل‌های مارکسیستی پرسش‌ها و دیدگاه‌هایی تازه دربارة نقد پیش آمد؛ دهه‌های 1980 و 1990 که نقد ارزیابانه رد و به جای آن نظریة نقد به مثابة نگاشت طرح ‌شد؛ سدة بیست و یکم که موضوع معماری ناقدانه و پیوند نقد و طراحی و نیز دیدگاه مقابل آن طرح شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The main Theories of Architectural Criticism in the West: Its history from the 19th Century to the Present

نویسندگان [English]

  • Motahareh Danaeifar 1
  • Zohreh Tafazzoli 2
1 PhD Candidate, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

There is difference between criticizing architecture and speaking about architectural criticism, its terms, principles, and methodology. One is architectural criticism and the other is its theory, which refers to foundations, approaches, philosophy, and criticism of architectural criticism. Regarding the world crisis of architectural criticism, more study and research on its theory is needed; and that's while theories of criticism aren't yet studied enough.
On one hand, Architectural criticism has no unique and persistent theory, and on the other hand, when we review its history, we see that different theories have been developed and refuted constantly. Changes of these theories is explicable by studying the history of architectural criticism; and in order to find its main theories and their changes, we investigate the theories of architectural criticism from its emergence in 19th century up to now. To show this history, this research is based on secondary sources of architectural criticism, and documentary research methods and conceptual history approach is applied.
In this article, theory of architectural criticism in the west will be examined in five principal eras: first, from the end of the 19th century to the mid of 20th century, during which the critique of the journalist criticism commenced and the controversial nature of architectural criticism and intermediary criticisms between the professionals and a non-specialized audience were constantly debated in architectural journals. At the same time the modern movement changed the concept of architecture and caused discussions about psychology and aesthetics criteria in architectural criticism; second, the 1960s, in which architectural theories were mainly affected by research in the methodologies of design studies and linguistics theories of the sign, both attempting toward a scientific theory for architectural criticism. in the meanwhile, theory of normative criticism supported by theory of modern architecture was developed; third is 1970’s era, when Marxian analyses of urban and architectural space, linguistic, anthropological and sociological matters of architecture were transposed into theory of criticism; 4th, the 1980s and 1990s, that was influenced by ever more individualized architectural tendencies, the absence of dominant doctrines, and the disintegration of ideologies, caused debates the paradigm shift of architectural criticism and change of its role from judging to mapping; the last is 21century, when the concept of critical architecture referring to the critical potentiality of architecture gave rise to harsh debate in the USA. Finally, the most recent research, 2016, titled "Mapping Architectural criticism, 20th and 21st Centuries: A Cartography" does not establish a theory or definition, rather, it aims at comparing several concepts of architectural criticism by historiography.
In this article, it is shown how the transformations of theories in the history of architectural criticism are influenced by the way theorists and critics consider the concept of architecture itself. It means whether considering architecture as an autonomous intellectual production, or an interdisciplinary production, directly affects the way of developing a theory of architectural criticism.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Architectural Criticism
  • Theory of Architectural Criticism
  • Theories of architectural criticism
  • Critique of Architectural criticism
  • History of architectural criticism
سبیت، کیت. نظریه‌های پسامدرن در معماری، ترجمة محمدرضا شیرازی، تهران: نشر نی، 1386.
کروچه، بندتو. «انتقاد و تاریخ هنر»، در کلیات زیبایی‌شناسی، ترجمة فؤاد روحانی، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی، 1393، ص 148-175.
Al-Asad, Mohammad & Majd Musa, eds. Architectural Criticism and Journalism, Umberto Allemandi, Turin, 2007.
Chotas, N.E. “The Critics’ Role in Aesthetic Evaluation of Architecture”, in Progressive Architecture, No. 38 (1957).
Collins, Peter. “Philosophy of Architectural Criticism”, in AIA Journal, Vol. 49 (January 1968), pp. 46-49.
________ . “The Interrelation Roles of History, Theory and Criticism in the Process of Architecture”, in The History, Theory and Criticism of Architecture, Cambridge, Massachuset, 1965, pp. 1-9.
________ . Architectural Judgement, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1971.
de Solà-Morales, I. & I.S.M. Rubió & I.S.M. Rubio & S. Whiting & G. Thompson. Differences: Topographies of Contemporary Architecture, Writing Architecture. MIT Press.1997, at  https://books.google.com/books?id=zwVD89T7cMYC.
Devillard, Valérie & Hélène Jannière. “Critique Archtecturale”, in Encyclopædia Universalis [En Ligne], Accessed January 4 2019, at http://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/critique-architecturale/.
Forty, Adrian. Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture, Thames & Hudson, New York, 2004.
Gill, Eric. “Painting and Criticism”, in Architectural Review, No. 400 (1930), pp. 111-112.
Gwilt, Joseph. Elements of Architectural Criticism. For The Use of Students, Amateurs, And Reviewer, The Classics.us, 2013.
Hays, K. Michael. “Critical Architecture: Between Culture and‌ Form”, in Perspecta, No. 21(1984), pp.15-29.
Hernandez, Antonio. “Zur Geschichte der Architekturkritik”, in Archithese: Architekturkritik, 1974.
Ingersoll, Richard, and Manfreso Tafuri. “There Is No Criticism, Only History: An Interview with Manfredo Tafuri.” In Design Book Review 9 (1986), pp. 8–11.
Jannière, Hélène. “Architecture Criticism: Identifying an Object of Study”, Translated by Michael Jameson, in OASE, No. 81 (2010), pp 33-55.
________ . “La Critique Architectural, Objet de Recherche”, in LES CAHIERS DE LA RECHERCHE ARCHITECTURALE ET URBAINE,No. 24/25, la critique en temps et lieux, 2009, pp, 121-40, at https://doi.org/9782858229444.
Jencks, Charles & George Baird. Meaning in Architecture, George Braziller, 1969
Rendell, J. Critical Architecture, Critiques (Architectural Humanities Research Association), Routledge. 2007.
Powell, Robert. Criticism in Architecture Proceedings of the Regional Seminar Sponsored by the Aga Khan Award for Architecture, The Foundation for International Studies, Malta, and the International Committee of Architectural Critics (CICA), Published for the Aga Khan Award for Architecture by Concept Media, Singapore, 1989.
Saboya, Marc & Hélène Jannière. “Architecture Revues D’”, in Encyclopedia Universalism [En Ligne], Accessed March 4, 2019 at http://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/revues-d-architecture/.
Sharp, Dennis. “Criticism in Architecture”, in Criticism in Architecture Proceedings of the Regional Seminar Sponsored by The Aga Khan Award For Architecture, by Robert Powell, the Aga Khan Award for Architecture, Singapore, 1989.
Summerson, J. “The Case for a Theory of ‘Modern’ Architecture”, in Royal Institute of British Architects Journal, 1957. pp. 307-310.
Whiffen, Marcus. The History, Theory and Criticism of Architecture, The M.I.T PRESS, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1965.
Zevi, Bruno & Max Blumenthal & Louise Noelle & Mildred Schmertz & Jorge Glusberg. “Founding Statement of the International Committee of Architectural Critics”, Mexico City. 1978, at https://cicarchitecture.org/2019/07/24/founding-statement-of-the-international-committee-of-architectural-critics-2/.
https://mac.hypotheses.org/about-the-project