صفه

صفه

درنگی بر اندیشه‌های فلسفی ‌‌‌دُلوز و گاتاری بر پدیدۀ شهر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
4 دانشیار دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
اهداف و پیشینه: در پژوهش حاضر با الهام از خوانش اندیشه‌های فلسفی دُلوز و گاتاری، نظریة اسمبلیجِ (هم‌آرایی) مانوئل دِلاندا بررسی می‌شود. هدف اصلی آشکارسازی جوانب نادیده‌شدة‌ در نظریة اسمبلیج است که در تحلیل‌های مفهوم شهر کمتر بدانها توجه می‌شود. در این پژوهش از یک‌سو، به بیان چارچوبی واحد و ساختارمند برای تشریح معنایی و عملکردی واژگان چندگانه در فلسفة دِلوز و گاتاری با تأکید بر پدیدة شهر پرداخته می‌شود، و از سوی دیگر، بازاندیشی و تحلیل انتقادی از نظریة اسمبلیج دنبال می‌گردد؛ در این رویکرد شناسایی شکاف‌های موجود در درک فلسفی شهر و بیان بازنمایی عمیق‌تری از این پدیده مورد نظر است.

مواد و روش‌ها:در این مطالعه، در فضای پارادایم آزادپژوهی، از استدلال منطقی و روش اکتشاف معنای مستتر در متون استفاده شده است. پژوهش بر پایة مطالعات گستردة منابع دست اول و دوم در تحلیل و تفسیر اندیشه‌های دِلوز، گاتاری، و دِلاندا استوار است. تحت این روش، تلاش شده است تا شکاف‌های موجود در درک فلسفی شهر شناسایی و درعین‌حال، بازنمایی اُرگیاستیک به‌مثابة شیوه‌ای متفاوت و عمیق‌تر برای تفسیر دستگاه معنایی شهر معرفی شود. با این رویکرد، پژوهشگر می‌تواند با تحلیل دقیق و منطقی، جنبه‌های نادیده‌شدة نظریة اسمبلیج را آشکار کند.

نتایج و جمع‌بندی: نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد در نظریة روشمند اسمبلیج، شهر پدیده‌ای متشکل از واقعیت‌های درون‌ماندگار «امر بالقوه» و «امر بالفعل» تعریف می‌شود. این منطق تحلیلی به این نتیجه می‌رسد که شهرْ فضایی روش‌شناختی برای پژوهشگران، طراحان، و مدیران شهری است و درعین پایایی، ناپایایی در سازه‌های معنایی خود دارد. از نظریه و روش هم‌آرایی می‌توان دستگاه فضایی انتزاعی‌ای برای شهر شناسایی کرد که با نگرشی متفاوت از تاریخ‌سازی، مکان‌سازی، ایده‌سازی، و هستی‌سازی چندگانه همراه است. این دیدگاه، به‌دلیل برخورداری از فضای میانی ـ آستانه‌ای و امکان هم‌آرایی داده‌های بسیار، دستاوردهای چندگانه‌ای را در عرصة شهر و مطالعات شهری فراهم می‌آورد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

A Review of the Philosophical Thoughts of Deleuze and Guattari on the Phenomenon of the City

نویسندگان English

Negin Samadi Kafi 1
Mojtaba Rafieian 2
Kaveh Rashidzadeh 3
Mahmud Rezaei 4
1 PhD Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Background and Objectives: Drawing on the philosophical frameworks of Deleuze and Guattari, this study critically examines Assemblage Theory as articulated by Manuel DeLanda, with particular attention to its underexplored implications for urban analysis. The study pursues two main objectives. First, it seeks to establish a coherent and structured framework for the semantic and functional interrogation of key philosophical constructs in Deleuze and Guattari’s thought, specifically as they relate to urban phenomena. Second, it aims to re-evaluate Assemblage Theory by identifying conceptual gaps and offering a nuanced interpretive lens for understanding the city. By integrating these perspectives, the research contributes to a deeper and more comprehensive representation of urban realities.

Materials and Methods: This research adopts an emancipatory paradigm, combining rigorous logical reasoning with a hermeneutic approach aimed at uncovering latent meanings in both primary and secondary texts. The methodological foundation rests on extensive textual analysis of the works of Deleuze, Guattari, and DeLanda, enabling the systematic identification of overlooked dimensions within Assemblage Theory. Complementing this analysis, the study introduces an orgiastic representational approach, designed to capture the city’s semantic multiplicities and dynamic processes in ways not previously articulated in urban research.

Results and Conclusion: Findings indicate that Assemblage Theory conceptualises the city as an intricate phenomenon composed of both virtual and actual realities. This duality positions the city as a methodological space that is simultaneously structured and unstable, allowing researchers, designers, and urban managers to navigate its inherent complexities. Through the lens of assemblage, the city emerges as an abstract spatial system capable of history-making, place-making, idea generation, and cultivating diverse forms of being. Its threshold spaces function as intermediaries enabling the alignment and integration of extensive datasets, generating novel analytical and practical insights within urban studies. The research thus highlights the city’s potential as a dynamic and generative entity, whose ontological multiplicity can inform both theoretical inquiry and applied urban practice.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Agencement
Assemblage
palimpsest
One-Multiplicity
Orgiastic Representation
Threshold.  
Allen, J. and A. Cochrane. “Assemblages of State Power: Topological Shifts in the Organization of Government and Politics”. Antipode, 42(5) (2010): 1071-1089.
Amin, A. “Re‐Thinking the Urban Social”. City, 11(1) (2007): 100-114.
Anderson, B. and C. McFarlane. “Assemblage and Geography”. Area, 43(2) (2012): 124-127.
Beck, C. and F.X. Gleyzon. “Deleuze and the Event(s)”. Journal for Cultural Research, 20(4) (2016): 329-333.
Bell, J.A. “Undoing the Subject: Deleuze and the Makings of a Sustainable Life”. In New Directions in Sustainable Design, Routledge, 2010, 247-259.
Bennett, J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.
Boundas, C.V. and V. Tentokali (Eds.). Architectural and Urban Reflections After Deleuze and Guattari. Rowman and Littlefield, 2017.
Brantner, C., J. Rodriguez-Amat, and Y. Belinskaya. “Structures of the Public Sphere: Contested Spaces as Assembled Interfaces”. Media and Communication, 9(3) (2021): 16-27.
Braun, B.P. “A New Urban Dispositif? Governing Life in an Age of Climate Change”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1) (2014): 49-64.
Buchanan, I. and G. Lambert. (Eds.). Deleuze and Space. University of Toronto Press, 2005.
Buchanan, I. “Assemblage Theory and its Discontents”. Deleuze Studies, 9(3) (2015): 382-392.
________ . Assemblage Theory and Method: An Introduction and Guide. Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.
Coleman, R. (Ed.). Deleuze and Research Methodologies. Edinburgh University Press, 2013.
Collins, F.L. “Desire as a Theory for Migration Studies: Temporality, Assemblage and Becoming in the Narratives of Migrants”. In Aspiration, Desire and the Drivers of Migration, Routledge, 2020, 56-72.
Dalton, C.M. “Rhizomatic Data Assemblages: Mapping New Possibilities for Urban Housing Data”. Urban Geography, 41(8) (2020): 1090-1108.
DeLanda, M. “Deleuze and the Use of the Genetic Algorithm in Architecture”. Architectural Design,71(7) (2002): 9-12.
________ . “Deleuze, Diagrams, and the Genesis of Form”. Amerikastudien / American Studies, (2000): 33-41.
________ . “Space: Extensive and Intensive, Actual and Virtual”. In Deleuze and Space, 2005, 80-88.
________ . “The New Materiality”. Architectural Design, 85(5) (2015): 16-21.
________ . A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2006.
________ . A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
________ . A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History. New York: Zone Books, 1997.
________ . Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus, transl. B. Massumi. London: Athlone, 1987.
Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophre-nia. Transl. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.
Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. Capitalisme et Schizophrénie. Paris: Les, 1980.
Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari. What Is Philosophy?. Columbia University Press, 1994.
Deleuze, G. “How Do We Recognize Structuralism?”. Transl. Melissa McMahon and Charles Stivale, in Charles Stivale, The Two-Fold Thought of Deleuze and Guattari: Intersections and Animations. New York: The Guilford Press, 1990, 258-282.
________ . Desert Islands and Other Texts: 1953-1974. Ed. D. Lapoujade. Transl. M. Taormina. New York: Semiotext(e), 2004.
________ . Dialogues II. London: Continuum, 2002.
________ . Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. transl. D.W. Smith, pb version, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.
________ . Masochism: Coldness and Cruelty, transl. J. McNeil. New York: Zone Books, 1989.
________ . Spinoza, Nietzsche, Hume, Bergson, Foucault, Beckett, Schizocovey, Leibniz, Palestine, Fragments, and a Life ... . transl. Iman Ganji and Peyman Gholami. Tehran: Cheshme Publishing, 2018. (In Persian)
________ . The Fold: Leibniz and Bbaroque. London: The Athlone Press, 1993.
Dewsbury, J. D. “The Deleuze‐Guattarian Assemblage: Plastic Habits”. Area, 43(2) (2011): 148-153.
Dovey, K. Becoming Places: Urbanism / Architecture / Identity / Power. Routledge, 2010.
Foucault, M. and G. Deleuze. “Intellectuals and Power”. In Language, Counter-memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, 1977, 205-217.
Foroughmand Araabi, H. and A. McDonald. “Towards a Deleuzoguattarian Methodology for Urban Design”. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 12(2) (2019): 172-187.
Fox, N.J. and P. Alldred. “Social Structures, Power and Resistance in Monist Sociology: (new) Materialist Insights”. Journal of Sociology, 54(3) (2018): 315-330.
Fox, N.J. and P. Alldred. “Applied Research, Diffractive Methodology, and the Research-Assemblage: Challenges and Opportunities”. Sociological Research Online, 28(1) (2023): 93-109.
Gabrielsson, C., H. Frichot, and J. Metzger. Deleuze and the City. Edinburgh University Press, 2016
Gabrys, J. “Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1) (2014): 30-48.
Ghoddousi, P. and S. Page. “Using Ethnography and Assemblage Theory in Political Geography”. Geography Compass, 14(10) (2020): e12533.
Gopinath, S. “Heterotopic Assemblages within Religious Structures: Ganesh Utsav and the Streets of Mumbai”. Open Cultural Studies, 3(1) (2019): 96-106.
Groat, L.N. and D. Wang. Architectural Research Methods. John Wiley and Sons, 2013.
Guattari, F. and S. Rolnik. MOLECULAR REVOLUTION IN BRAZIL. Transl. Karel Clapshow and Brian Holmes. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e) Foreign Agent Series, 2008.
Habibi, SM. and N. Samadi Kafi. “Palimpsest, A Tool for Explaining the Identity of the Historic City”. Soffeh Journal, Shahid Beheshti University, 20(2) (2020): 71-90. (In Persian)
Haghighi, F. Is the Tehran Bazaar Dead? Foucault, Politics, and Architecture. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018.
Hallward, P. Out of this World: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation. Verso, 2006.
Hillier, J. “The ‘Flatness’ of Deleuze and Guattari: Planning the City as a Tree or as a Rhizome?”. DisP-The Planning Review, 57(2) (2021): 16-29.
________ . Deleuze, Guattari and Power . Handbook on Planning and Power, 2023.
Jervis, B. Assemblage Thought and Archaeology. Routledge, 2018.
Jones, R. and L. Instone. “Becoming‐urban, becoming‐forest: a historical Geography of Urban forest projects in Australia”. Geographical Research, 54(4) (2016): 433-445.
Kinkaid, E. “Can Assemblage Think Difference? A Feminist Critique of Assemblage Geographies”. Progress in Human Geography, 44(3) (2020): 457-472.
Kleinherenbrink, A. “Metaphysical Primitives: Machines and Assemblages in Deleuze, DeLanda, and Bryant”. Open Philosophy, 3(1) (2020): 283-297.
Lane, M. The Power of Geography: Universal Discourse, Global Coloniality, and Local Sovereignty in the Sustainable City Apparatus. Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2017.
Langer, B. “The House that Gilles Built, Absolute Motion”. DATUTOP, 22 (2002): 24-69.
Lara-Hernandez, J.A., A. Melis, and S. Lehmann. “Temporary Appropriation of Public Space as an Emergence Assemblage for the Future Urban Landscape: The Case of Mexico City”. Future Cities and Environment, 5(1) (2019): 1-22.
Latour, B. “Reassembling the Social”. In Actor Network Theory (Introduction), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Legg, S. “Assemblage / Apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault”. Area, 43(2) (2011): 128-133.
Marcus, G.E. and E. Saka. “Assemblage”. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2-3) (2006): 101-106.
Marsh, D. and M. Śliwa. “Making a Difference through Atmospheres: The Orange Alternative, Laughter and the Possibilities of Affective Resistance”. Organization Studies, 43(4) (2022): 477-496.
Martin, L. and A.J. Secor. “Towards a Post- mathematical Topology”. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3) (2014): 420-438.
McFarlane, C. “Translocal Assemblages: Space, Power and Social Movements”. Geoforum, 40(4) (2009): 561-567.
McGowan, N. Adaptable Urbanism: Understanding Self-organised Territorialisation in Urban Communities, Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, 2019.
Mittal, G. “The State and the Production of Informalities in Urban Transport: Vikrams in Dehradun, India”. Geoforum, 136(2022): 273-282.
Muminović, M. Advanced Assemblage Analysis of Built Environment and Persistence of the Identity of Place in Yanesen  (本文), Doctoral Dissertation, 慶應義塾大学, 2013.
Muminović, M. “Places as Assemblages: Paradigm Shift or Fashionable Nonsense?”. Athens Journal of Architecture, 1(4) (2015): 295-309.
Muminović, M. “Place as Assemblage: Abstracting, Diagramming and Mapping”. Athens Journal of Architecture, 5(1) (2019): 61-76.
Müller, M., and C. Schurr. “Assemblage Thinking and Actor‐network Theory: Conjunctions, Disjunctions, Cross‐fertilisations”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3) (2016): 217-229.
Nail, T. “What is an Assemblage?”. SubStance, 46(1) (2017): 21-37.
Passia, Y. and P. Roupas. “An Apparatus for Mapping Urban Complexity”. In Machinic Assemblages of Desire: Deleuze and Artistic Research, 3 (2021): 419.
Patt, T. “Assemblage Form: An Ontology of the Urban Generic with Regard to Architecture, Computation, and Design”. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312865898_Assemblage_form_an_ontology_of_the_urban_generic_with_regard_to_architecture_computation_and_design - January 2016.
Platt, L.C. and D. Medway. “Sometimes ... Sometimes ... Sometimes ... Witnessing Urban Placemaking from the Immanence of ‘the Middle’”. Space and Culture, 25(1) (2022): 105-120.
Purcell, M. “A New Land: Deleuze and Guattari and Planning”. Planning Theory and Practice, 14(1) (2013): 20-38.
Roffe, J. and H. Stark. “Deleuze and the Non/human”. In Deleuze and the Non / human (Introduction). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, Introduction, 2015, 1-16.
Saldanha, A. Space after Deleuze. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.
Samadi Kafi, Negin. Unfolding the Palimpsestuous Folds of Place, Based on Theory and Methodology of Assemblage; Case Study: Historical District of Tehran. Ph.D. Dissertation in Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran, 2025.
Savage, G.C. “What is policy Assemblage?”. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3) (2020): 319-335.
Secor, A. “2012 Urban Geography Plenary Lecture Topological City”. Urban Geography, 34(4) (2013): 430-444.
Searle, G. and S. Darchen. “New Urban Sustainability Policies: Deleuze and Local Innovation Versus Policy Mobility”. Planning Theory and Practice, (2023): 1-7.
Shih, Y.C. Thickness of Borders: Walking Routes as Mediation in an Urban Space. 2021.
Shehata, L.M., H.S. Gabr, and A.H. Alsadaty. “Constructing a Conceptual Tool of Sociable Public Places: An Integrated Approach”. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE, 67(3) (2020): 547-564.
St. Pierre, E.A. “Deleuze and Guattari’s Language for New Empirical Inquiry”. Educational philosophy and Theory, 49(11) (2017): 1080-1089.
Stevenson, F. “Stretching Language to Its Limit: Deleuze and the Problem of Poiesis”. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 35(1) (2009): 77-108.
Walsh, Z., J. Böhme, and C. Wamsler. “Towards a Relational Paradigm in Sustainability Research”. Practice, and Education, Ambio, 50(1) (2021): 74-84.
Wang, J. “Urban Assemblage”. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, 2019, 1-6.
Wiertz, T. “Biopolitics of Migration: An Assemblage Approach”. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(7) (2021): 1375-1388.

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 26 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 14 بهمن 1403