معماری چون واسطۀ استکمال معرفتی انسان جستجو در رابطۀ معماری و انسان با تکیه بر فلسفۀ سیدمحمدحسین طباطبایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف و پیشینه: سابقة هزاران‌سالة معماری روشن می‌کند که میان انسان و معماری روابط و مناسبت‌هایی برقرار است. امروزه متأثر از فهم غالب از معماری این رابطه را به نحوی برقرار می‌دانیم؛ اما ممکن است که فهم امروزین ما چونان پرده‌ای زوایای پنهان و پیچیدة رابطة انسان و معماری را از دید ما دور کرده باشد. در این تحقیق رابطه و مناسبت انسان و معماری را از دریچه‌ای نو و با تکیه بر فلسفة سیدمحمدحسین طباطبایی بررسی کرده‌ایم. تا کنون در هیچ تحقیقی از این منظر و متکی بر این دستگاه نظری به معماری یا رابطة انسان با معماری نپرداخته‌اند. تنها نمونة شایان توجه رسالة دکتری نگارنده است با عنوان «تاریخ معماری در مقام معرفت» که در آن به‌منظور روشن کردن رابطة معماری با تاریخ و فهم چیستی تاریخ معماری از دستگاه نظری سیدمحمدحسین طباطبایی استفاده شده است.
مواد و روش‌ها: این تحقیق در شمار تحقیق‌های غیرکمّی است و روش و راهبرد اصلی آن به تأسی از شیوة سیدمحمدحسین طباطبایی و به فراخور نوع تحقیق‌های فلسفی استدلال عقلی است، اگرچه در بیان مقدمات نظری تحقیق و استخراج مفاهیم اصلی آن از منابع فلسفی یادشده و شرح آن مفاهیم از روش تحلیل مضمونی نیز بهره گرفته‌ایم. در این تحقیق ابتدا مراد از مفردات موضوع، یعنی مراد از انسان و معماری در جایگاه عملی انسانی، را روشن و سپس بخشی از دستگاه نظری طباطبایی را معرفی کرده‌ایم که متضمن جهان‌نگری فلسفی او و مبین رابطة انسان با اعمال صناعی اوست. در ادامه کوشیده‌ایم مفهوم معماری را با نظر به شیوة نگریستن طباطبایی به جهان شرح دهیم.
نتیجه و جمع‌بندی: در این تحقیق رابطة انسان با معماری از منظر فلسفة طباطبایی را شرح و نشان داده‌ایم که اولاً معماری در شمار اعمال صناعی انسان و یکی از حرکات ممکن در جهان است، و ثانیاً هرگاه انسان به معماری می‌پردازد، در عین تصرف در مادة جهان، در نفس خودش نیز تصرف می‌کند و مقارن آنکه چیزی را در عالم ماده برپا می‌کند، نفس خودش را هم می‌سازد و معرفت می‌اندوزد و از این راه استکمال معرفتی می‌یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Architecture as a Mediator for Human Perfection: A Search for the Nature of the Relationship between Humans and Architecture Based on Mohammad Hossein Tabatabai’s Philosophy

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Gholamali Fallah,
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and objectives: Influenced by the prevailing understanding of architecture, we take the relationship between humans and architecture for granted, but this understanding has also obscured some aspects of this relationship. In this research, we have studied the relationship between humans and architecture based on the philosophy of Seyed Mohammad Hossein Tabatabai. The main question of this research is: ‘What is the relationship between humans and architecture if we look at the world from Tabatabai’s philosophical point of view’. Until now, previous researches have never considered architecture or the relationship between humans and architecture from this point of view and based on these theoretical foundations. The only relevant example is this author’s doctoral dissertation entitled Architectural History as Knowledge, in which Tabatabai’s theoretical apparatus was used to clarify the relationship between architecture and history and to understand what architectural history is.
Methods: The research is non-quantitative with its main method and strategy being rational reasoning, based on Tabatabai’s method and philosophical research methodologies. Nevertheless, the thematic analysis method is also used for exploring the theoretical foundations of the research and extracting main concepts from the mentioned philosophical sources and explaining them. We have first clarified the main terms of the discussion, that is, the meaning of ‘human’ and ‘architecture as a human practice’. Then we have introduced a part of Tabatabai’s theoretical system which includes his philosophical worldview and the relationship between humans and their practices. We have then tried to explain the concept of architecture in terms of Tabatabai’s way of looking at the world. Finally, we have described the relationship between humans and architecture from the perspective of Tabatabai philosophy.
Results and conclusion: The research shows that in Tabatabai’s worldview, firstly, architecture is among human crafts, one of the possible movements (Harkat) in the world, and secondly, whenever humans engage in architecture, whilst manipulating the world’s materiality, they also change themselves; at the same time establish something in the material world, they also build their own souls and accumulate knowledge, and in this way attain perfection.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Architecture
  • Human
  • Craft
  • Human perfection
  • Mohammad Hossein Tabatabai’s Philosophy
Ali Tajer, Saeed. “The Existential Wisdom of Architecture: Relying on the Opinions of Sadr al-Mutalahin”. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, 2013. (In Persian)
Aristotle. Akhlaq-e Nikumakhusi [=Nicomachean Ethics]. Persian translation by Muhammad-Hasan Lotfi. Tehran: Tarh-e No, 1998. (In Persian)
Dehkhoda, Aliakbar. Loghatnameh [= Dictionary]. Supervised by Muhammad Mo’in and Ja’far Shahidi. Tehran: Dehkhoda Dictionary Institute, Tehran University, and Rowzaneh, 1998. (In Persian)
Dehqani, Mohsen, Translator and Commentator. Forugh-e Hekmat: Tarjomeh va Sharh-e Nahayat al-Hikmat-e Allameh Seyyed-Muhammad-Hussein Tabatabayi (3 Vols.). Written by Seyyed-MuhammadHussein Tabatabayi. Qum: Bustan-e Ketab, 2009. (In Persian)
Dinani, Gholam-Hossein. Qava’ed-e Kolli-ye Falsafi dar falsafe-ye Eslami [=General philosophical rules in Islamic philosophy] (3 Vols.). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2001. (In Persian)
Ekhwan al-Safa. Rasaʾel Ekhwan al-Safaʾ (=Encyclopedia of the Brethren of Purity) (4 Vols.). Beirut: Dar-al-Islamiyya, 1992. (In Arabic)
Golam’ali Fallah, Mohammad. Architectural History as Knowledge. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University, 2018. (In Persian)
Hasanzade-ye Amoli, Hasan. Dorus-e Ma’refat-e Nafs [=Self-knowledge Lessons]. Tehran: ‘Elmi va Farhangi Publication, 2012. (In Persian)
Heidegger, Martin. “Porsesh az Teknolozhy [= Question Concerning Technology]”. Translation by Shapur E’temad. In: Arqanun, No. 1 (Spring 1994): 1-30. (In Persian)
Ibn Sina, Hossein ibn Abdollah. al-Isharat wa al-Tanbihat (ma’a al-Mohakimat) (3 Vols.). Comment by Muhammad ibn Muhammad Qutb-al-Din Razi and Muhammad ibn Muhammad Nasir-al-Din Tusi. Qum: Daftr-i Nashr al-Kitab, n.d. (In Arabic)
________ . Borhan-e Shafa. Persian translation by Mahdi Qavam-Safari. Tehran: Fekr-e Rouz, 1994. (In Persian)
Khajeh Nasir-al-Din Tusi. Akhlaqe Naseri. Edited by Mojtaba Minavi and Alireza Heydari. Tehran: Kharazmi, 2011. (In Persian)
Mirfendereski, Abulqasem ibn Mirzabozorg. Resal-ye Sana’iye. Edited by Hasan Jamshidi. Qum: Bustan-e Ketab-e Qum, 2008. (In Persian)
Morteza Zobeydi, Muhammad ibn Muhammad. Taj al-‘Arus men Javahir al-Qamus (16 Vols.). Comment by Muhammad ibn Ya’qub Firuzabadi. Edited by ‘Ali Shiri. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1993. (In Arabic)
Motahari, Morteza. Majmu’e-ye Asar 5 [= Collection of Works 5]. Tehran: Sadra, 2010. (In Persian)
________ . Mas’ale-ye Shenakht [= Problem of episteme]. Tehran: Sadra, n. d. (In Persian)
Muhammadi Reyshahri, Muhammad, and Reza Berenjkar. al-‘Elm wa al-Hikma fi al-Kitab wa al-Sunna. Qum: Darolhadith Publication, 2011. (In Arabic)
Pazuki, S. “The Meaning of Industry in Islamic Wisdom: Description and Analysis of Mirfenderski’s Treatise on Industry”. Kheradname Sadra, no. 48 (2006): 95-106. (In Persian)
Ragheb Esfahani, Hossein ibn Muhammad. Mofradat-i Alfaz-e Quran [=Dictionary of Qur’anic terms]. Edited by Safwan ‘Adnan Dawodi. Beirut: Dar-al-Shamiya, 1992. (In Arabic)
RaisSamii, M. “Theory of Hierarchy of Existence: Interpretation in Architecture”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, 2013. (In Persian)
Sadr-al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim. al-Hikmat al-Mota’aliya fi al-‘Asfar al-‘Aqliyah al-‘arba’ah (9 Vols.). Comment by Seyyed-MuhammadHussein Tabatabayi and others. Qum: Maktab al-Mustafawi, 1989. (In Arabic)
Shartuni, Sa’id. Aqrab al-Mawarid fi Fosh al-‘Arabiya wa al-Shawarid (3 Vols.). Qum: Marashi Library, 1983. (In Arabic)
Shirvani, ‘Ali, Translator and Commentator. Tarjomeh va Sharh-e Nahayat al-Hikmah (3 Vols.). Written by Seyyed-Muhammad-Hussein Tabatabayi. Qum: Dar al-Fikr, 2008. (In Persian)
Shirvani, ‘Ali, Translator and Commentator. Tarjomeh va Sharh-e Bedayat al-Hikmah (4 Vols.). Written by Seyyed-Muhammad-Hussein Tabatabayi. Qum: Dar al-Fikr, 2010. (In Persian)
Tabatabayi, Seyyed-Muhammad-Hussein. Osul-e Faslsaf va Ravesh-e Realism [= Principles and Method of the philosophy of realism] (5 Vols.). Comment by Morteza Motahari, 1985. (In Persian)
________ . Osul-e Faslsaf-ye Realism [= Principles of the philosophy of realism]. Edited by Hadi Khosrowshahi. Qum: Bustan-e Ketab-e Qum, 2008. (In Persian)
________ . Tarjome-ye Tafsir-e al-Mizan (20 Vols.). Persian translation by MuhammadBaqer Musavi-Hamedani. Isfahan: Ahlolbait Research and Publication Institute, 1984. (In Persian)
Tahanavi, Muhammad-Ali ibn Ali. Musu’aa Kashshaf Istilahat al-Fonun wa al-Olum [= Description of Technical and Scientific Terms] (2 Vols.). Arabic translation by Abdollah Khaledi and George Zinati and comment by Ali-Farid Dahruj. Beirut: Librarie du Liban Publishers, 1996. (In Arabic)