تأملی بر سازوکارهای داوری برخی مقالات مستخرج از پایان‌نامه‌های دکتری معماری (با اتکا به نظریۀ همدلی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار دانشکدۀ فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

یکی از مهم‌ترین مراحل سازوکار هر داوری در مجلات معتبر علمی مطالعة دست‌نوشته‌هایی است که به مجلات ارسال می‌گردند. دست‌نوشته‌ همان گزارش علمی است که وقتی چاپ شد با عنوان مقالة علمی معرفی می‌گردد. در بین این دست‌نوشته‌ها آنها که برگرفته از رساله‌‌های دکتری هستند حساسیت بیشتری را برمی‌انگیزند؛ از این لحاظ که سرنوشت دانشجویان دکتری در مراحل پایانی دفاع از رساله به چاپ یا پذیرش مقالات مستخرج از این رساله وابسته است. بررسی تعدادی از این دست‌نوشته‌ها که دانشجویان دکتری معماری به مجلات تخصصی این رشته در ایران ارسال کرده بودند، نشان داد گاه فهم داور و نویسنده از مطالب نوشته‌شده مشترک و همدل نیست. این مسئله باعث نارضایتی طرفین از نوشتار مقالات یا نظرات داوری شده که گاه به فرایند مطالعة دست‌نوشته‌ها یا نظرات داوری برمی‌گردد. در این مقاله سعی شد با تکیه بر نظریة همدلی و تأکید بر اهمیت تجربة زیستة افراد، راهکارهایی پیشنهاد گردد تا بتوان بر اساس آنها، فهم نویسنده و داور را نسبت به مطالبی که بین آنها ردوبدل می‌شود به هم نزدیک کرد. به بیان دیگر، بتوان کمک کرد آنچه مقصود نویسنده است را داور فهم کند و آنچه مقصود داور است نیز توسط نویسنده به‌خوبی فهم و انجام گردد. این مقاله به روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی تنظیم شده و روش پژوهش با تکیه بر نظریة همدلی، به‌مثابة نظریة پشتیبان، استدلال منطقی است. گردآوری مطالب به دو روش کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی و مصاحبه با دانشجویان انجام شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Reflection on Peer Review Mechanisms in Some Articles Extracted from PhD Theses in Architecture (Based on the Empathy Theory)

نویسنده [English]

  • Seyedeh Saeideh Hoseinyzadeh
Assistant professor, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Payam-e Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

One of the most important steps in the peer review process is studying manuscripts. Manuscripts extracted from PhD theses are particularly sensitive as they play a key role in students’ pre-viva stages, deciding their eligibility to hold their viva. A review of submissions shows inconsistencies between reviewers’ and authors’ understandings of manuscripts, causing mutual dissatisfaction. This issue occasionally goes back to review procedures. The present research tries to propose some solutions based on the Empathy Theory: solutions that help bringing the reviewer and the author closer to each other through a better mutual understanding. The paper uses a descriptive-analytical method, with logical reasoning using the Empathy Theory, and the data is collected through library studies and interviewing students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Manuscripts
  • Peer Review of Architectural Articles
  • Empathy Theory
  • Lived experience in architecture
Abooyee Ardakan, SM., SA. Mirzaie, F. Sheikhshoaei. “The Peer-Review Process for Articles in Iranâs Scientific Journals”. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, no. 72 (2013): 305-346.
Abooyee Ardakan, SM. and SA. Mirzaei. “Referees and Ethics of Peer-Review in the Iranian Scientific Journals”. Journal of Ethic in Science and Technology. no. 1 (2010): 36-47.
Alidosti, S., A. Abd-Al-Majeed, M. Khosrowjerdi, and F. Mohammadi. “Scientific periodicals in the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology: Systemic approach Systemic approach”. Journal of Library and Information Sciences, no. 47(2009): 169-208. (In Persian).
Amanollahi A., L. Sarikhani, A. Azhandeh, and F. Shokraneh. “Objective and Subjective Criteria in Assessing the Accpeted or Rejected Manuscripts of Journal of Health Administration”. Journal of Health Administration, no. 57 (2014) :26-45. (In Persian).
Ammenwerth, E., A.C. Wolff, P. Knaup, H. Ulmer, S. Skonetzki, J.H. Van Bemmel, A.T. McCray, R. Haux, and C. Kulikowski. “Developing and Evaluating Criteria to Help Reviewers of Biomedical Informatics Manuscripts”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, no. 5 )2003): 512-514.
Anderson, L.W. and D.R. Krathwohl. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, 2001.
Buckingham, M., D.O. Clifton. Now, Discover Your Strengths. Persian transl. Bahareh Pazhumand. Mashhad: Shemshad, 2021. (In Persian).
Benos, D.J., K.L. Kirk, and J.E. Hall. “How to Review a Paper?”. Advances in Physiology Education, no. 27 (2003): 47-52.
Bergen, B. “Experimental Methods for Simulation Semantics”. in M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, and M.J. Spivey (Eds.). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2007, 277-301.
Beyti, H., M. Gharehbaglou, and B. Pourjavadasl. “Historical Houses as Architecture Schools in aspect of Student Lived Experience; Case study: Tabriz Islamic Art University”. Soffeh, no. 92 (2021): 83-96. (In Persian).
Bloomer, K.C., C.W. Moore, R.J. Yudell, and B. Yudell. Body, Memory, and Architecture. Yale University Press, 1977.
Carman, Taylor. Merleau-Ponty. London & Newyork: Routledge, 2008.
Ershad, F., M. Karakhani, and A. Mirzaei. “Analysis of refereed documents of Iranian sociology journal articles”. Iranian Journal of Sociology, vol. 6, no. 4 (2005): 3-33. (In Persian).
Gallese, V. “Embodied Simulation Theory: Imagination and Narrative”. Neuropsychoanalysis, no.13 (2011): 196-200.
Gallese, V. and G. Lakoff. “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-motor System in Conceptual Knowledge”. Cognitive Neuropsychology, no. 22 (2005): 455-479.
Garmel, GM. “Reviewing Manuscripts for Biomedical Journals”. The Permanente Journal, no. 14 (2010): 9-32.
Gurgin Karaji, A. and M. Babazadeh. “The Challenges of Peer-Refereeing in the Technical and Engineering Articles of Iranian Journals”. Journal of Engineering Sciences Elites, vol. 5, no. 3 (2020): 213-233. (In Persian).
Hames, Irene. Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, xi, 293 p. ISBN: 978-1-4051-3159-9, 2007.
Hoppin, FG Jr. “How I Review an Original Scientific Article”. Am J Respir Crit Care, Med, no. 166 (2002): 1019-1023.
Hoseinyzadeh, S. Embodiment in Architectural Design Skills Training. PhD dissertation in architecture. Yazd: Yazd University. 2022. (In Persian).
Lang, J. Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Persian transl. Alireza Einifar. Thran: Tehran University, 2002. (In Persian).
Makizadeh, F. and F. Zare Dehabadi. “Bias in Peer Review”. Digital and Smart Libraries Researchers, no. 22 (2019): 51-62. (In Persian).
Mallgrave, H.F. The Architect’s Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity, and Architecture. Persian transl. Karim Mardomi and Sima Ebrahimy. Tehran: Honar-Memari-Qarn. 2016. (In Persian).
Mansourian, Yazdan. “Review and Management of Articles in Scientific Journals: Solutions for Competent Performance”. Journal of Koliat-Ketab-Mah, no. 173 (2012): 47-44. (In Persian).
________ . “Ups and Downs in the Arbitration Process”. Journal of Koliat-Ketab-Mah, no. 167 (2018): 69-64. (In Persian).
Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception. Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2005.
Mirjani, H. “Architectural Reference to the Past: Searching for a Method to Acquire Practical Design Knowledge through the Experience of Architectural Examples”. PhD dissertation in architecture, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. 2018. (In Persian).
Mirzaei, SA., SM. Abooyee, M. Gharakhani, and F. Sheikhshoaei. “Peer review in scientific journals: case study of Iranian Sociology Journal”. Iranian Journal of Sociology. no. 16 (2006): 147-179. (In Persian).
MohammadGharravi, Anna. “Common Types of Peer Review for Journals Articles”. Journal of Knowledge and Health in Basic Medical Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1 (2019): 1-2. (In Persian).
Motalebifard, A., A. Naveh-Ebrahim, H. Mohabbat, and A. Sadin. “Research Ethics in Higher Education: Individual Characteristics and Professional Responsibilities of Researchers”. Journal of Knowledge Studies, no. 19 (2013): 73-84. (In Persian).
Ortigue, S., C. Sinigaglia, G. Rizzolatti, and S.T. Grafton. “Understanding Actions of Others: The Electrodynamics of the Left and Right Hemispheres, A High-density EEG Neuroimaging Study”. PLOS ONE, no. 5(8) (2010): e12160.
Oulia, MB., M. Shakiba. “How to Judge Research Articles in a Scientific and Systematic Way?”. Journal of Shahid Sedghi University of Medical Sciences and Health-Therapeutic Services, vol. 16, no. 2 (2008): 3-8. (In Persian).
Pallasmaa, J. “Empathic Imagination: Formal and Experiential Projection”. Architectural Design, no. 84 (2014): 80-85.
Pallasmaa, J., H.F. Mallgrave, S. Robinson, and V. Gallese. Architecture and Empathy (Collection of lectures). Edited by Philip Tidwell. Persian transl. Mohammad Golshan and Nima Esmaeily. Mashhad: Ketabkadeh-Kasra, 2021. (In Persian).
Qaramaleki, A. “Ethics of Scientific Refereeing: An Islamic Approach”. Strategy for Culture, no. 8-9 (2010): 7-19. (In Persian).
Rajabaly-Biglo, R. and A. Thegat-Al-Eslami, Z. Rajabaly-Biglo, and N. Haji-Azizi. “Peer-reading Process and Its Ethical Challenges: Can We Hope for Moral Judgment?”. Ethics in Science and Technology. vol. 17, no. 6 (2022): 16-21. (In Persian).
Ramachandran, V.S. The Tell-Tale Brain: A Neuroscientists Quest for What Makes Us Human, Persian transl. Masoume Malekian. Tehran: Sailav Publication, 2019. (In Persian).
Razjoyan, M. and S. Masoudinejad. Step by Step into the Creating Architectural Theory (From Question to a Theory, From Theory to a Dissertation). Tehran: Rozaneh, 2019. (In Persian).
Rizzolatti, G. and L. Craighero. “The Mirror-neuron System”. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., no. 27 (2004): 169-192.
Rizzolatti, G., L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese. “Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying the Understanding and Imitation of Action”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, no. 9 (2001): 661-670.
Robinson, S. and J. Pallasmaa. Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment, and the Future of Design. Persian transl. Reza Amirrahimy. Thran: Memar-Nashr, 2017. (In Persian).
Shafiei, M. “The Difference between Understanding and Reason in the Kant’s Thought”. Journal of Wisdom and philosophy, no. 15 (2008): 137-144. (In Persian).
Soylu, F. “An Embodied Approach to Understanding: Making Sense of the World through Simulated Bodily Activity”. Frontiers in Psychology, no. 7 (2016): Article 1914.
Weller, A.C. The Refereeing Process in Scientific Journals: Its Strengths and Weaknesses. Persian transl. AliHossein Ghasemi and Siros Azadi. Tehran: Chapar publication (Research Institute of Information Science and Technology of Iran). 2009. (In Persian).
Williamson, A. “What Will Happen to Peer Review”. Learned Publishing, no. 16 (2003): 15-20.
Yamini, S., P. Alimohammadi, and K. Bazrafkan. “The Role of Designers’ Lived Experience in Representation of Architectural Archetypes: A Case Study of Iranian-born Foreign-Educated Architects’ Designs”. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, no. 111(2022): 5-16. (In Persian).
Zumthor, P. Atmospheres: Architectural Environments, Surrounding Objects. Persian transl. Mehdi Pirhayati. Tehran: First and Last Publication, 2020. (In Persian).
________ . Thinking architecture, Atmospheres, Introduction of Works: Phenomenological approach in Zumthor’s Thought. Persian transl. Morteza Nikfitrat and Sediqeh Mirgozar. Tehran: Institute of Architect’s Science Publication, 2013. (In Persian).
www.Magiran.com