آموزش شیوة برداشتِ صحیح از مصادیق در طراحی معماری منظر

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد دانشکدة معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران

2 دکتری معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران

چکیده

طراحان منظر از منابع مختلف برای ایده‌پردازی الهام می‌گیرند. یکی از منابع الهام معماران منظر، آثار گذشته است. با توجه به رواج بهره‌گیری از آثار سایرین در طراحی دانشجویان، این سؤال مطرح است که چگونه می‌توان دانشجویان معماری منظر را در جهت بهره‌گیری صحیح از مصادیق در ایده‌پردازی هدایت کرد. در این مقاله ابتدا به کمک نظرات سایر محققان، انواع منشأ ایده‌پردازی معماری منظر به صورت منابع الهام درونی و بیرونی مورد بررسی قرار می‌گیرد و جایگاه الهام از مصادیق در بین سایر منابع شناخته می‌شود. سپس به کمک تئوری برداشتِ ساختاری، انواع برداشت در قالب چهار نوع برداشت ساختاری، برداشت سطحی، کپی‌برداری، و استعاره معرفی می‌شوند. آنگاه راهکارهای سایر محققان در جهت رسیدن به برداشت صحیح در آموزش معماری منظر مورد بررسی قرار گرفته و راهکارهایی شامل انتخاب نمونة مناسب، شناخت برداشت صحیح، و تمرین برداشت صحیح ارائه خواهد شد. نتایج این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که آموزش معماری منظر در جهت توانمند ساختن دانشجویان برای برداشت صحیح راه دشواری پیش رو دارد و علاوه بر اینکه دانشجویان باید برداشت صحیح را تمرین کنند، مدرسان منظر نیز باید در این خصوص آگاهی‌های لازم را داشته باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Correct Mapping for Landscape Architecture Design Education

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Feyzi 1
  • Leila Ali-pour 2
1 Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iranian University of Science and Technology
2 Ph.D. candidate, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iranian University of Science and Technology
چکیده [English]

Landscape architects use different sources of inspiration for generating design ideas, among them previous works. Since this is the most frequent method used by design students, the question posed is how can landscape architecture students be guided through the correct ways of mapping from built examples. This paper first reviews the works of scholars on the approaches to generating design ideas as internal/external sources of inspiration, locating the place of built examples as sources of inspiration. Next, by employing the structure-mapping theoretical framework, various mapping strategies are introduced as structural mapping, superficial mapping, literal mapping, and metaphor. The suggestions of other scholars regarding the guidance through the correct ways of mapping in landscape architecture design education are presented, among them, the selection of a good example, knowledge of and training for correct mapping in students. The results of this research show that promoting landscape architecture students in this regard has a difficult track ahead, involving students’ training efforts and educators’ expected awareness

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • landscape architecture education
  • idea generation
  • sources of inspiration
  • correct mapping method

مراجع

  1. Bearman, Christopher, Linden J Ball and Thomas C
  2. Ormerod. “An Exploration of Real-World Analogical
  3. Problem Solving in Novices.” In 24th Conference of the
  4. Cognitive Science Society, 2002.pp. 101-106.
  5. Bonnardel, Nathalie. “Towards Understanding and
  6. Supporting Creativity in Design: Analogies in a
  7. Constrained Cognitive Environment.” Knowledge-Based
  8. Systems 13, no. 7 (2000): 505-513.
  9. Broadbent, Geoffrey. Design in Architecture: Architecture
  10. Cardoso, Carlos and Petra Badke-Schaub. “Idea Fixation in
  11. Design: The influence of Pictures and Words.” In ICORD 09:
  12. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research
  13. into Design, Bangalore, India 07.-09.01. 2009, 2009.
  14. -------- . “Fixation or Inspiration: Creative Problem Solving
  15. in Design.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 45, no. 2 (2011):
  16. -82.
  17. -------- . “The Influence of Different Pictorial
  18. Representations During Idea Generation.” The Journal of
  19. Creative Behavior 45, no. 2 (2011): 130-146.
  20. Cardoso, Carlos, Petra Badke-Schaub and Ana Luz. “Design
  21. Fixation on Non-Verbal Stimuli: The Influence of Simple
  22. Vs. Rich Pictorial Information on Design Problem-Solving.”
  23. In ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical
  24. Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering
  25. Conference, 995-1002: American Society of Mechanical
  26. Engineers, 2009.
  27. Casakin, Hernan. “Visual Analogy as a Cognitive Strategy
  28. in the Design Process: Expert Versus Novice Performance.”
  29. journal of Design Research 4, no. 2 (2004): 253-268.
  30. Casakin, Hernan and Gabriela Goldschmidt. “Expertise
  31. and the Use of Visual Analogy: Implications for Design
  32. Education.” Design Studies 20, no. 2 (1999): 153-175.
  33. Chan, Joel, Katherine Fu, Christian Schunn, Jonathan
  34. Cagan, Kristin Wood and Kenneth Kotovsky. “On the
  35. Benefits and Pitfalls of Analogies for Innovative Design:
  36. Ideation Performance Based on Analogical Distance,
  37. Commonness, and Modality of Examples.” Journal of
  38. mechanical design 133, no. 8 (2011): 081004.
  39. Cheng, Peiyao, Ruth Mugge and Jan PL Schoormans. “A
  40. New Strategy to Reduce Design Fixation: Presenting Partial
  41. Photographs to Designers.” Design Studies 35, no. 4 (2014):
  42. -391.
  43. Cheong, Hyunmin and L. H. Shu. “Using Templates and
  44. Mapping Strategies to Support Analogical Transfer in
  45. Biomimetic Design.” Design Studies 34, no. 6 (2013): 706-
  46. Chrysikou, Evangelia G and Robert W Weisberg. “Following
  47. the Wrong Footsteps: Fixation Effects of Pictorial Examples
  48. in a Design Problem-Solving Task.” Journal of Experimental
  49. the Impact of Visual Stimuli on Design Problem Solving
  50. Performance.” Design Studies 27, no. 5 (2006): 549-569.
  51. Gonçalves, Milene, Carlos Cardoso and Petra Badke-
  52. Schaub. “How Far Is Too Far? Using Different Abstraction in
  53. Textual and Visual Stimuli.” In DS 70: Proceedings of DESIGN
  54. , the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik,
  55. Croatia, 2012.
  56. -------- . “Around You: How Designers Get Inspired.”
  57. Proceedings ICED2011 7, (2011): 404-413.
  58. -------- . “Find Your Inspiration: Exploring Different Levels
  59. of Abstraction in Textual Stimuli.” In 2nd international
  60. conference on design creativity (ICDC2012), Glasgow UK,
  61. -------- . “Inspiration Peak: Exploring the Semantic Distance
  62. between Design Problem and Textual Inspirational
  63. Stimuli.” International Journal of Design Creativity and
  64. Innovation 1, no. 4 (2013): 215-232.
  65. -------- . “What Inspires Designers? Preferences on
  66. Inspirational Approaches During Idea Generation.” Design
  67. Studies 35, no. 1 (2014): 29-53.
  68. Heylighen, Ann and Herman Neuckermans. “Are Architects
  69. Natural Case-Based Designers? Experts Speaking.” The
  70. Design Journal 5, no. 2 (2002): 8-22.
  71. Howard, T.J., A.M. maier, B. Onarheim and M. Friis-Olivarius.
  72. “Overcoming Design Fixation through Education and
  73. Creativity Methods.” In The 19th International Conference on
  74. Engineering Design. ICED 13, 139-148, 2013.
  75. Jansson, David G and Steven M Smith. “Design Fixation.”
  76. Design Studies 12, no. 1 (1991): 3-11.
  77. Jencks, Charles. “The New Paradigm in Architecture.”
  78. Architectural Review 213, no. 1272 (2003): 72-7.
  79. Jormakka, Kari, Oliver Schürer and Dörte Kuhlmann. Basics
  80. Design Methods: Birkhäuser, 2008.
  81. Linsey, JS, I Tseng, K Fu, J Cagan, KL Wood and C Schunn. “A
  82. Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in
  83. Engineering Design Faculty.” Journal of Mechanical Design
  84. , no. 4 (2010): 041003.
  85. Matlock, Elizabeth. The Search for Appropriate Form: The
  86. and the Human Sciences: John Wiley & Sons New York, USA,
  87. Broadbent, Geoffrey and Anthony Ward. Design Methods in
  88. Architecture: Lund Humphries London, 1969.
  89. Cai, Hui, Ellen Yi-Luen Do and Craig M. Zimring. “Extended
  90. Linkography and Distance Graph in Design Evaluation: An
  91. Empirical Study of the Dual Effects of Inspiration Sources
  92. in Creative Design.” Design Studies 31, no. 2 (2010): 146-
  93. Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31, no. 5
  94. (2005): 1134.
  95. Cross, Nigel. “Designerly ways of knowing”. Design Studies
  96. , no. 4 (1982), 221-227.
  97. Dahl, Darren W and Page Moreau. “The Influence and Value
  98. of Analogical Thinking During New Product Ideation.”
  99. Journal of Marketing Research 39, no. 1 (2002): 47-60.
  100. Durie, Jamie. Inspired: The Ideas That Shape & Create My
  101. Design: HarperCollins, 2006.
  102. Eckert, Claudia and Martin Stacey. “Sources of Inspiration:
  103. A Language of Design.” Design Studies 21, no. 5 (2000):
  104. -538.
  105. Eilouti, Buthayna Hasan. “Design Knowledge Recycling
  106. Using Precedent-Based Analysis and Synthesis Models.”
  107. Design Studies 30, no. 4 (2009): 340-368.
  108. Fisher, Melissa, “The Highline: New York City’s park in the
  109. sky.” Available online at http://www.unife.it/ing/lm.civile/
  110. insegnamenti/dismissione-di-siti-industriali-e-gestionedei-
  111. rifiuti/impianti/materiale-didattico/fisher%20-%20
  112. THE%20HIGH%20LINE%20-%20NYC.pdf. 2018
  113. Gausa, Manuel and Susanna Cros. The Metapolis Dictionary
  114. of Advanced Architecture: City, Technology and Society in the
  115. Information Age: Actar, 2003.
  116. Gentner, Dedre. “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical
  117. Framework for Analogy.” Cognitive science 7, no. 2 (1983):
  118. -170.
  119. Gentner, Dedre and Arthur B Markman. “Structure
  120. Mapping in Analogy and Similarity.” American psychologist
  121. , no. 1 (1997): 45.
  122. Goldschmidt, Gabriela. “Visual Analogy: A Strategy for
  123. Design Reasoning and Learning.” Design knowing and
  124. learning: Cognition in design education, (2001): 199-220.
  125. -------- . “Avoiding Design Fixation: Transformation and
  126. Abstraction in Mapping from Source to Target.” The Journal
  127. of creative behavior 45, no. 2 (2011): 92-100.
  128. Goldschmidt, Gabriela and Anat Litan Sever. “Inspiring
  129. Design Ideas with Texts.” Design Studies 32, no. 2 (2011):
  130. -155.
  131. Goldschmidt, Gabriela and Maria Smolkov. “Variances in
  132. Relationship between Landscape Architecture and Art in
  133. Three Time Periods: ProQuest, 2008.
  134. McGinty, Tim. “Concepts in Architecture.” Introduction to
  135. architecture, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, (1979): 208-235.
  136. Moore, A. “The Sierra in the city: Lawrence Halprin and
  137. Levi plaza.” Available online at http://experiments.
  138. californiahistoricalsociety.org/the-sierras-in-the-citylawrence-
  139. halprin-and-levis-plaza/ .2016.
  140. Mougenot, Celine, Carole Bouchard, Ameziane Aoussat
  141. and Steve Westerman. “Inspiration, Images and Design:
  142. An Investigation of Designers Information Gathering
  143. Strategies.” Journal of Design Research 7, no. 4 (2008): 331-
  144. Ozkan, Ozgu and Fehmi Dogan. “Cognitive Strategies of
  145. Analogical Reasoning in Design: Differences between
  146. Expert and Novice Designers.” Design Studies 34, no. 2
  147. (2013): 161-192.
  148. Sharky, Bruce. Thinking About Landscape Architecture:
  149. Principles of a Design Profession for the 21st Century:
  150. Routledge, 2016.
  151. Smith, Kendra Schank. Architects’ Drawings: A Selection
  152. of Sketches by World Famous Architects through History:
  153. Routledge, 2005.
  154. Smith, Steven M and Julie Linsey. “A Three‐Pronged
  155. Approach for Overcoming Design Fixation.” The Journal of
  156. Creative Behavior 45, no. 2 (2011): 83-91.
  157. Tsenn, Joanna, Olufunmilola Atilola, Daniel A. McAdams
  158. and Julie S. Linsey. “The Effects of Time and Incubation
  159. on Design Concept Generation.” Design Studies 35, no. 5
  160. (2014): 500-526.
  161. Vosniadou, Stella and Andrew Ortony. Similarity and
  162. Analogical Reasoning: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  163. Youmans, Robert J and Thomaz Arciszewski. “Design
  164. Fixation: Classifications and Modern Methods of
  165. Prevention.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design,
  166. Analysis and Manufacturing 28, no. 02 (2014): 129-137.
  167. Youmans, Robert J . “The Effects of Physical Prototyping
  168. and Group Work on the Reduction of Design Fixation.”
  169. Design Studies 32, no. 2 (2011): 115-138.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 20 خرداد 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 08 بهمن 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 دی 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار