The Post-Sandstorm Rehabilitation of Rural Settlements Using Action Research Method; the Case of Sang Abad, Kerman Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University

3 MSc, Post-Disaster Reconstruction, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Deemed to be one of the most important problems in desert areas, sandstorms are among regularly-occurring disasters. They particularly affect rural areas due to their vulnerability, causing many economic, livelihood-related, physical, social, cultural, and environmental damages. Reagan County in Kerman province is known as one of the country’s most critical areas in this respect, with recent incidents causing 50 evacuations, and damages to a further 150 villages. Widespread droughts in recent decades have caused a lot of damage to the area’s nomadic communities such Sang Abad. Bearing in mind the frequent recurrence of the hazard, the rural settlements of this area are exposed to gradual decay. Exposure to local and regional sources of sandstorms, the high levels of vulnerability, and the poverty and deprivation necessitates the rehabilitation of the village.
The action research method is used here. For two years, the researchers have participated in the reconstruction of Sang Abad village (August 2016 - September 2018). Devising a comprehensive and integrated reconstruction planning for the village, they have intervened in rehabilitation and reconstruction keeping in close contact with the residents. The findings have then gone through process of assessment and valuation obtained from the study of the action research methodology. Bearing in mind the differences between the method used here with those of mainstream approaches to reconstruction studies, the feasibility of using this method in future reconstruction studies is also examined. The results of evaluating rehabilitation and reconstruction activities in Sang Abad have shown the effectiveness of these activities in reducing sandstorm hazards. It also seems that rehabilitation of the economy and livelihood is one of the most critical reconstruction priorities in rehabilitation of rural settlements exposed to sandstorms and in particular Sangabad.

Keywords


ادیب حاج باقری، محسن و همکاران. روشهای تحقیق کیفی، تهران: بشری، 1386.
امیدوار، کمال. «تحلیلی از رژیم بادهای شدید و طوفانی یزد»، در برنامهریزی و آمایش فضا، ش 65 (بهار 1389)، ص 83-105.
آیسان، یاسمین و دیویس، یان. معماری و برنامهریزی بازسازی، ترجمة علیرضا فلاحی، تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، 1385.
چمبرز، رابرت. توسعة روستایی: اولویتبخشی به فقرای روستایی، ترجمة مصطفی ازکیا، تهران: دانشگاه تهران، 1387.
رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا و همکاران. «فرایند مدیریت بلایای طبیعی در دو شیوة بومی و جدید: روستاهای بخش خورش رستم (شهرستان خلخال)»، در فصلنامه برنامهریزی و آمایش فضا، ش 60 (بهار 1388)، ص 63-94.
زرگر، اکبر. درآمدی بر شناخت معماری روستایی ایران، تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، 1393.
مک‌نیف، جین و دیگران. اقدامپژوهی (طراحی، اجرا، ارزشیابی)، ترجمة محمدرضا آهنچیان، تهران: رشد، 1382.
 
Barakat, Sultan. Rebuilding and Resettlement, 9 Years Ler: a Case Study of the Contractor Built Reconstruction in Yemen, Following the 1982 Dhamar Earthquake, UK: IAAS. Post-war reconstruction & development unit, 1993.
Creswell, J.W. & C.N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among five Approaches, New York: Sage publications, 2016.
Greenwood, Davyd J. & Morten Levin. Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change, New York: SAGE publications, 1998.‏
Ku, Hok Bun. “Post-disaster Community Development in Rural Sichuan, China”, in Rural and Community Development, 10(3) (2015).‏ p. 122.
Middleton, Nick. & Utchang Kang,. “Sand and Dust Storms: Impact Mitigation”, in Sustainability, 9(6) (2017). p. 1-22.
Squires, Victor R. “Dust and Sandstorms: an Early Warning of Impending Disaster”, in Global Alarm: Dust and Sandstorms from World's Drylands,  2001, p. 15-28.‏
http://www.participatorymethods.org