Applying Q method to Identify and Prioritize Rural Housing Design Aspects

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Mohaghegh Ardebili University

2 Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

One of key challenges in rural housing design is the misinterpretation of residents’ actual needs and preferences. Incorrect assumptions about user preferences usually lead designers to propose standard solutions insensitive to users’ culture and mentality. The Q methodology is a form of factor analysis that is used to analyze correlations between subjects across a sample of variables. Therefore, it reduces the many individual viewpoints of the subjects down to a few factors, which represent shared ways of thinking. The sample of statements for a Q sort is drawn from a “concourse”, i.e. the sum of all things people say or think about the issue being investigated. The Q method commonly uses a structured sampling approach in order to test and represent the full breadth of a concourse.
This paper employs Q methodology to investigate housing preferences in Jailanabad Village close to Isfahan City. It indicates that in contrast with initial assumptions, there is a marked difference among villagers regarding their housing characteristics. For lower-income residents, the key housing priorities are the costs of construction and obtaining legal permits. These residents prefer inexpensive small houses, which could be built with minimal municipal procedures. On the other hand, the high-income villagers prefer housing which boasts their affluence and prestige. Accordingly, they prefer buildings taller than one storey with façade decorations symbolizing their social status.

References

  1. علی‌الحسابی، مهران و امین عبدمجیری. «تأثیر روابط فرهنگی اجتماعی بر معماری مسکن روستایی، مطالعۀ موردی: روستاهای ناحیۀ شرق استان خراسان». در مجموعه مقالات اولین کنفرانس بین‌المللی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی: مسکن، و بافت، محور تخصصی: برنامه-ریزی و طراحی مسکن روستایی (جلد دوم): تهران: بنیاد مسکن انقلاب اسلامی، 1389، ص 39-58.
  2. خوشگویان‌فرد، علیرضا. روش‌شناسی کیو، تهران: مرکز تحقیقات صدا و سیمای جمهوری اسلامی ایران، 1386.
  3. Brown, S.R. “Q Methodology and Naturalistic Subjectivity”, in B. Midgley & E. Morris (Eds.), Modern Perspectives on J.R. Kantor and Interbehaviorism, Reno, NV: Context Press, 2006, pp. 251-268.
  4. ________ . “Q Methodology”, in M.S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T.F. Liao (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Vol. 3, 2004, pp. 887-888.
  5. ________ . “The History and Principles of Q Methodology in Psychology and the Social Sciences”, Read at the British Psychological Society symposium on, A Quest for a Science of Subjectivity: The Lifework of William Stephenson, University of London, 1997.
  6. Duenckmann, F. “The Village in the Mind: Applying Q-Methodology to Re-constructing Constructions of Rurality”, in Journal of Rural Studies, No.26 (2010), pp. 284–295.
  7. McKeown, B. & D. Thomas. Q Methodology, Newbury Park, 1988.
  8. Reber BH. & SE. Kaufman & F. Cropp. “Assessing Q-Assessor: A Validation Study of Computer-Based Q Sorts versus Paper Sorts”, in Operant Subjectivity, Vol. 23, No. 4 (2000), pp. 192-209.
  9. Robbins, P. & R. Krueger. “Beyond Bias? The Promise and Limits of Q-Method in Human Geography”, in Professional Geographer, Vol. 52, No. 2 (2000), pp. 636–648.
  10. Robbins, P. “Q Methodology”, in Kempf-Leonard, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, Vol. 3, Amsterdam, 2005.
  11. Van Exel, N. & G. de Graaf. “Q Methodology: A Sneak Preview”, Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg, et al, 2005, pp. 209–215.
  12. http://earthnc.com/chartviewer/index.php?ll=32.665092154682675,51.89708344418482&z=16دست‌یابی در تاریخ 20 آبان 1393
Soffeh
Volume 25, Issue 4 - Serial Number 71
January 2016
Pages 113-132

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 31 December 2016
  • Revise Date: 31 January 2021
  • Accept Date: 31 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics