Constrained Possibilities: Housing Typology, Regulation and Non Deterministic Evolution of Urban Form in Tehran

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of Construction, Architecture and BIM, Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The transformation of Tehran’s urban fabric throughout the twentieth century generated a wide spectrum of housing typologies shaped by shifting planning ideologies, regulatory frameworks, and socio-spatial conditions. Existing literature has often interpreted these changes through linear narratives of modernisation or Western influence, neglecting the mediating role of regulation and the significance of intermediate spatial scales. This study aims to examine the evolutionary trajectory of housing typology and urban morphology in Tehran between 1900 and 2000, focusing on the interaction between macro-scale planning mechanisms and micro-scale architectural form. The primary objective is to assess whether housing evolution followed a deterministic path or whether multiple typological outcomes emerged within constrained regulatory and spatial conditions.
 
Materials and Methods: The research adopts a multi-scalar and interdisciplinary methodology integrating urban history, morphological analysis, and empirical spatial investigation. Three representative residential areas of 500 × 500 m, corresponding to distinct phases of Tehran’s urban development, are analysed using Geographical Information Systems (GIS). This is combined with archetypal modelling based on Steadman’s geometric principles to examine relationships between block structure, plot subdivision, density, site coverage, and housing layout. Architectural variables—including access systems, frontage conditions, day-lit depth, and spatial configuration—are systematically evaluated in relation to planning regulations, enabling comparative analysis across historical periods.
 
Results and Conclusion: The results indicate that housing typologies in Tehran were strongly influenced by plot structure, block morphology, and regulatory constraints; however, these influences operated in a non-deterministic manner. Multiple spatial configurations emerged within similar regulatory frameworks, demonstrating a probabilistic relationship between planning rules and architectural form. The transition from inward-oriented courtyard houses to outward-facing row houses and later apartment buildings is therefore interpreted as an adaptive process shaped by functional requirements and regulatory negotiation rather than a direct transplantation of Western models. By foregrounding the intermediate scale of plots, blocks, and housing types, this study challenges reductive interpretations of Tehran’s urban transformation and highlights the coexistence of traditional spatial logics and modern planning systems. The research contributes a robust analytical framework for linking regulation to architectural form and offers insights relevant to contemporary housing policy and urban design.
 

Keywords

References

Alemi, Mahvash. ‘The 1891 Map of Tehran: Two cities, two cores, two cultures.’ AARP Environmental design 1 (1985): 74-84. http://archnet.org/publications/2513
Bonine, Michael E. ‘The morphogenesis of Iranian cities.’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69, no. 2 (1979): 208-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01252.x
Caniggia, Gianfranco, and Gian Luigi Maffei. Architectural composition and building typology: interpreting basic building. Vol. 176. Alinea Editrice, 2001., 2001. https://books.google.com/books?id=0Xm_9o0F8VUC
Conzen, Michael Robert Gunter. ‘Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis.’ Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers) 27 (1960): iii-122.
Costello, Vincent F. ‘The morphology of Tehran: A preliminary study.’ Built Environment (1978-) (1998): 201-216.Forty Adrian 2000. Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture New York, Thames & Hudson.
Forty, Adrian, and Adrian Forty. Words and buildings: A vocabulary of modern architecture. Vol. 268. London: Thames & Hudson, 2000.
Habibi Mohsen 1996. Az Shar ta Shahr (From Town to City): Historic analysis of the urban conception and its physical aspects Tehran, The University of Tehran Press.
Habibi, Seyed Mohsen. Az Shar ta Shahr (From Town to City): Historic analysis of the urban conception and its physical aspects. Tehran: University of Tehran, (1996). https://press.ut.ac.ir
Habibi, Seyed Mohsen, and Bernard Hourcade. ‘Atlas of Tehran metropolis.’ Tehran: Urban Processing and Planning Co 1 (2005). http://www.atlasdeteheran.com
Hillier, Bill. Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax, 2007. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3881/
Kirschenmann, J.C. & Muschalek Christian 1977. Residential Districts London, Granada Publishing Limited.
Madanipour, Ali. ‘Tehran: the making of a metropolis.’ World cities series (1998). https://www.wiley.com
Madanipour, Ali. ‘Urban planning and development in Tehran.’ Cities 23, no. 6 (2006): 433-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00043-1
Madanipour, Ali. ‘Urban planning and development in Tehran.’ Cities 23, no. 6 (2006): 433-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.08.002
Madanipour, Ali. ‘The limits of scientific planning: Doxiadis and the Tehran Action Plan.’ Planning Perspectives 25, no. 4 (2010): 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2010.505020
Madanipour, Ali. ‘Sustainable development, urban form, and megacity governance and planning in Tehran.’ In Megacities: urban form, governance, and sustainability, pp. 67-91. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99267-7_4
Marshall Stephen. Streets & Patterns Oxon, Spon Press, 2005.
Marshall Stephen. Cities Design and Evolution Abingdon, Routledge, 2009.
Martin Leslie ‘The grid as generator,’ In Urban Space and Structures, Martin Leslie & March Lionel, eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6-27. 1972,
Martin Leslie, March Lionel, & others 1972, ‘Speculations,’ In Urban Space and Structures, Martin Leslie & March Lionel, eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 28-54.
Mazumdar Sanjoy 2000. Autocratic Control and Urban Design: The Case of Tehran, Iran. Journal of Urban Design, 5, (3) 317-338
Milani, A. M. (2021). The impact of regulations on the typo-morphological transformation of residential buildings in Tehran. Urban Morphology, 25(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.51347/UM25.0012
Mirmoghtadaee, Mahta. ‘Process of Housing Transformation in Iran.’ Journal of Construction in developing Countries 14, no. 1 (2009). http://web.usm.my/jcdc/vol14_1_2009.html
Moudon, Anne Vernez. ‘Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field.’ Urban morphology 1, no. 1 (1997): 3-10: http://www.urbanmorphology.org
Rode, Philipp, and Ricky Burdett. ‘Cities: investing in energy and resource efficiency.’ (2011): 453-492. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/40779/
Aydın, Alpay. ‘Aldo Rossi in Turkey: Translations and Appropriations.’ Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University (Turkey), 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/108764
Scoffham Ernie Scoffham. Sustainable Housing: Principles and Practice. London: E & FN Spon. 2000.
Shayesteh, H; (2013) Typo-morphological Approach to Housing Transformation in Tehran. Doctoral thesis, UCL (University College London).
Shayesteh, H; Steadman, P; (2013) The impact of regulations and legislation on residential built forms in Tehran. Journal of Space Syntax, 4 (1) 92 - 107. 
Shayesteh, H., & Steadman, P. (2015). Coevolution of urban form and built form: a new typo-morphological model for Tehran. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42(6), 1124-1147. https://doi.org/10.1068/b140002p 
Shayesteh, Homeira, and Philip Steadman. ‘Typo-morphological analysis of housing layout and density in Tehran.’ In Urban Change in Iran: Stories of Rooted Histories and Ever-accelerating Developments, pp. 187-204. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26115-7_14
Sherwood, Roger. Modern housing prototypes. Harvard University Press, 1978.
Sintusingha, Sidh, and Morteza Mirgholami. ‘Parallel modernization and self-colonization: Urban evolution and practices in Bangkok and Tehran.’ Cities 30 (2013): 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2012.02.001
Steadman, Philip. ‘Binary encoding of a class of rectangular built forms.’ A. Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, 2001.
Steadman, Philip. ‘How day-lighting constrains access.’ In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Space Syntax, London: University College London, pp. 05-1. 2003..
Steadman Philip 2005, Linear City: A morphological approach, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Volume I.
Steadman, Philip, and Stephen Marshall. ‘Archetypal layout: Extending the concept of the archetypal building to streets and block layouts.’ In Solutions Conference, London. 2005.
Talen, Emily. City rules: How regulations affect urban form. Island Press, 2012.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 February 2026
  • Accept Date: 22 February 2026

Share

How to cite

Statistics