Understanding the Physical-Spatial Characteristics of Behaviour Settings in Low-Income Housing; the Case of Panjtan Neighbourhood in Mashhad

Akbari Sharak, Mahsa; Mousavinia, Seyyedeh Fatemeh; Pourdeihimi, Shahram

doi:10.48308/soffeh.2024.235311.1319

Understanding the Physical-Spatial Characteristics of Behaviour Settings in Low-Income Housing; the Case of Panjtan Neighbourhood in Mashhad

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mahsa Akbari Sharak ¹

Seyyedeh Fatemeh Mousavinia ²

Shahram Pourdeihimi ³

¹ MArch Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

² Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

³ Professor, Faculty of Architecture, University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran.

10.48308/soffeh.2024.235311.1319

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Following the rapid growth of urbanisation, providing housing for low-income groups is considered one of the most important issues. Most projects implemented for these groups so far are short of acceptable quality. Given the floor area constraints in affordable housing, designers’ success depends on prioritising the needs of users over individual preferences. The way each space is laid out can affect the resident behaviour, making careful considerations of activities and behaviour all the more crucial, especially when it comes to cultural differences. According to previous studies, the factors affecting the organisation of behaviour fall into two categories: physical-spatial and cultural, with culture in turn influencing the physical-spatial factor. On the other hand, behaviour is organised through physical-spatial environment –including spatial layout and fixed and semi-fixed elements – and cultural components including lifestyle, activities, space use timing, and symbolism. The present study aims to identify the physical-spatial characteristics of behaviour settings and their interrelations in low-income housing, by examining daily activities of individuals. In order to do so, an interconnected network of physical-spatial characteristics of behaviour settings was presented based on current patterns of behaviour and common activities in low-income housing, to give a better understanding to designers.

Materials and Methods: Panjtan neighbourhood in Mashhad’s Region 4 was selected due to its standing at tier 4 (out of 5, for socio-economic status), 10 houses were studied for their characteristics such as housing type (apartments with a living room), ownership, floor area of 80-120 square metres with a maximum width of 7 metres, and an at least a 20-year residence history. Data was collected using two methods: environmental data collection (in the form of maps, sketches, photos, and videos) and unstructured (in-depth) interviews. Since human activities are organised in time (day, night, weekdays, weekends, etc.), a study of behaviour settings was conducted on weekdays, weekends and special religious holidays. The seventh interview did not return any more new data. However, to make sure about data saturation further three interviews were conducted. Multiple interviews were arranged with each participant at different times and occasions over one-year period to achieve a proper understanding of the categories. Data analysis was conducted through the content analysis technique. MAXQDA 2022 software was used to code and categorise the data collected from the interviews. Data coding was carried out in three stages, including open, axial, and selective coding. In the open coding stage, each of the interview statements was placed in a group according to the concept. In the axial coding, common semantic units in the propositions were extracted, followed by selective coding, in which the main concepts of the semantic units were determined and presented in the form of the core physical-spatial characteristic of the behaviour setting.

Results and Conclusion: The findings show that of seven behaviour settings – Living room, reception, yard and roof, kitchen, home-based workspace, bedroom, and front door area – the living space has a wide range of behaviour settings, and is the centre of activities playing an important role in family interactions, and therefore should have the possibility of connecting to the yard or semi-open spaces. Reception (integrated with living space), as a symbol of the homeowner’s dignity, provides the opportunity to create activities such as family gatherings. Maintaining visual privacy in the kitchen space and being spacious are the most important features of this space. Given the living conditions of this group, a space for home-based work that has a proper connection with the living space (especially the kitchen) is one of the most important issues.
The study showed that behaviour settings can take different characteristics due to the type of activity at different times. Therefore, time-dependency directly affects their structure. In the studied group, family gatherings and holding religious ceremonies on a weekly, monthly, or special-occasion basis, significantly affect the physical-spatial characteristics and how bases are organised. Providing sufficient walls to lean against and arranging lower-traffic spaces are among the design solutions that will help in this respect. Open and semi-open spaces, provided comfort is achievable, can be converted into living and working spaces in the warm seasons, and living space settings can be transferred to these spaces. The presence of a roofed balcony (even with a light roof and vegetation) and its connection with the kitchen and cooking space, where the mother can also interact with others while doing work, will lead to the creation of a suitable and usable environment.
A small change in the structure of a behaviour setting, the study indicates, can have a significant impact on the way of life and activities of residents. This work is often done in a simple but intelligent way by residents in their daily lives. The present study provides a practical image of behaviour settings to guide designers toward the right direction. Such work should be done, it is concluded, in real-life environments, with researchers having direct, intimate, and long-term contact with users. This hinders the present result from being generalised and used elsewhere.

Keywords

Residential environments

Low-income housing

Daily activities

Behaviour settings

MAXQDA

Subjects

Architecture

Adewumi, Ayomikun Solomon, Vincent Onyango, Dumiso Moyo, Husam Al Waer, and Ayotunde Dawodu. “Conceptualising the Characteristics of the Indicators of a Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment Framework in a Developing Country Context”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 102 (September 2023): 107197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2023.107197

Afshari, Mohsen, Shahram Pourdiehimi, and Bahram Saleh Sedghpour. “Environmental Adaptation of Human Lifestyle (A Theoretical Framework, A Case Study)”. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, vol. 34, no. 152 (2015): 3-16. (In Persian).

Alalhesabi, Mehran, Abdolhadi Daneshpour, and Roozbeh Dadjou. “Identifying and Prioritizing Housing Indicators of Low-Income Groups Based on a Perceptual-Mental Approach A Case Study the Bojnurd City”. Journal of Geographical Urban Planning Research, vol. 10, no. 1 (2022): 133-148. (In Persian).

Andersen, Hans Skifter. “Why Do Residents Want to Leave Deprived Neighbourhoods? The Importance of Residents’ Subjective Evaluations of Their Neighbourhood and Its Reputation”. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 23, no. 2 (2008): 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-008-9109-x

Awamleh, Zaid, and Deniz Hasirci. “A Multi-Method Behavior Setting Analysis of a Protracted Refugee Camp in Jordan”. Environment and Behavior, vol. 54, no. 4 (2022): 783-808. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165221084726

Baker, Emma and Laurence Lester. “Multiple Housing Problems: A View through the Housing Niche Lens”. Cities, no. 62 (October 2017): 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.001

Barker, Roger G. Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1968.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Routledge. Routledge, 1984.

Caplan, Joel M., Leslie W. Kennedy, Jeremy D. Barnum, and Eric L. Piza. “Crime in Context: Utilizing Risk Terrain Modeling and Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations to Explore the Dynamics of Criminogenic Behavior Settings”. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, vol. 33, no. 2 (2017): 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216688814

Coolen, Henny. The Meaning of Dwelling Features: Conceptual and Methodological Issues IOS Press. IOS Press, 2008.

Cosco, Nilda G., Robin C. Moore, and Mohammed Z. Islam. “Behavior Mapping: A Method for Linking Preschool Physical Activity and Outdoor Design”. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 42, no. 3 (2010): 513-519. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181cea27a

Creswell, John W., William E. Hanson, Vicki L. Clark Plano, and Alejandro Morales. “Qualitative Research Designs: Selection and Implementation”. The Counseling Psychologist, vol. 35, no. 2 (2007): 236-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390

Croese, Sylvia, Liza Rose Cirolia, and Nick Graham. “Towards Habitat III: Confronting the Disjuncture between Global Policy and Local Practice on Africa’s ‘Challenge of Slums’”. Habitat International, 53 (2016): 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.037

Day, Kristen. Feminist Approaches to Urban Design. Public Space Reader, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202558-12.

Duerk, Donna P. Architectural Programming: Information Management for Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Press, 1993.

Fatourehchi, Dorsa, and Esmaeil Zarghami. “Social Sustainability Assessment Framework for Managing Sustainable Construction in Residential Buildings”. Journal of Building Engineering, no. 32 (November 2020): 101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101761

Gharehbaglou, M, A Ghaffari, and R.C. Asl. “The Effect of Sense of Community on the Formation of Behavior Settings (Case Study: Ritual Public Spaces of Tabriz)”. BAGH-E NAZAR, vol. 21, no. 130 (2024): 61-76. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2024.392773.5365 (In Persian)

Golrokh, Shamin. Behavior Setting. Tehran: Armanshahr Press, 2012. (In Persian).

Heft, Harry. “Ecological Psychology as Social Psychology?”. Theory and Psychology, vol. 30, no. 6 (2020): 813-826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320934545

Hillier, Bill and Julienne Hanson. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Hosseini, Hadi. “A Study of Global Policies on Affordable Housing Provision and a Proposed Mechanism for Housing Planning in Iran”. Journal of Architectural Studies, 1 (2018): 1-11. (In Persian).

Ibem, Eziyi O., Pearl A. Opoko, and Egidario B. Aduwo. “Satisfaction with Neighbourhood Environments in Public Housing: Evidence from Ogun State, Nigeria”. Social Indicators Research, vol. 130, no. 2 (2017): 733-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1188-y

Ilesanmi, Adetokunbo Oluwole. “Post-Occupancy Evaluation and Residents Satisfaction with Public Housing in Lagos, Nigeria”. Journal of Building Appraisal, vol. 6, no. 2 (2010): 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2010.20

Kalis, Annemarie. “How Concepts Travel in Actual Spaces: The Interdisciplinary Classroom as a Behavior Setting”. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, vol. 12, no. S1 (2023): 50-66.

Kandel, Eric R., John D. Koester, Sarah H. Mack, and Steven A. Siegelbaum. Of Neur Al Principles Science. Principles of Neural Science. McGraw-Hill, 2021.

Karji, Ali, Asregedew Woldesenbet, Mostafa Khanzadi, and Mohammadsoroush Tafazzoli. “Assessment of Social Sustainability Indicators in Mass Housing Construction: A Case Study of Mehr Housing Project”. Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, 50 (October 2019): 101697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101697.

Keshmiri, Hadi and Hadi Nikounam Nezami. “The Concept of Behavioral Setting and Its Impact on Improving Environmental Quality Neighborhood Parks (Case Study: Shiraz Sekonj Neighborhood Park)”. International Journal of Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning (IJAUP), vol. 33, no. 2 (2023): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.687

Lang, Jon and Walter Moleski. Functionalism Revisited: Architectural Theory and Practice and the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge. New York and London: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315254838

Liu, Jian and Huay Ying Ong. “Can Malaysia’s National Affordable Housing Policy Guarantee Housing Affordability of Low-Income Households?”. Journal of Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 16 (August 7, 2021): 8841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168841

Low, Setha. Behind the Gates, Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York and London: Routledge, 2004.

Malik, Sana, Ruhizal Roosli, Fariha Tariq, and Nor’aini Yusof. “Policy Framework and Institutional Arrangements: Case of Affordable Housing Delivery for Low-Income Groups in Punjab, Pakistan”. Journal of Housing Policy Debate, vol. 30, no. 2 (March 3, 2020): 243-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2019.1681018

Mason, Mark. “Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, vol. 11, no. 3 (2010).

Mayring, Philipp A.E. “Qualitative Content Analysis”. In International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth Edition, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.11031-0

Mehri Ghahfarokhi, Esmail, Maryam Ekhtiari, and Hamidreza Sharif. “Analysis Framework for Recognition Behavioral Settings in Residential Spaces (Case Study: Farhang Shahr District in Shiraz)”. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba Journal, no. 3 (2020): 19-36. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2021.306903.672503 (In Persian)

Moore, Gary T. “The Physical Environment and Cognitive Development in Child-Care Centers”. In Spaces for Children, 1987, 41-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5227-3_3

Mousavinia, SeyyedehFatemeh. “How Residential Density Relates to Social Interactions? Similarities and Differences of Moderated Mediation Models in Gated and Non-Gated Communities”. Land Use Policy, vol. 120 (July 2022): 106303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106303

Nestler, Eric J., Steven E. Hyman, David M. Holtzman, and Robert H. Malenka. Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 11. McGraw-H., 2015. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420070-8.00002-

Nourtaghani, Abdolmajid. “Meaning in Dwelling: The Modeling Organization of Meaning in Turkmen Dwelling”. Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, 2012.

Onyango, Vincent, and Solomon Ayomikun Adewumi. “Selecting Indicators for Assessing Neighbourhood Sustainability: The Metropolitan Lagos Workflow”. European Scientific Journal ESJ, vol. 17, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021.v17n2p170.

Peyravi, Hoda, Morteza RazaviNejad, and Mohammad Ghanbari. Atlas of Mashhad Neighborhoods; Vol 4, Panjtan Neighborhood. Mashhad Municipality, Deputy of Planning and Human Capital Development, 2021. (In Persian).

Pourdeihimi, Shahram. City, Housing, and Complexes. Tehran: Armanshahr Press, 2012. (In Persian).

________ . Cognition, Mind, and Theory of Environmental Design. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press, 2023. (In Persian).

Rapoport, Amos. “Interview with Amos Rapoport”. Arch. & Comport. / Arch. & Behav, vol. 8, no. 1 (1992): 10.

________ . Theory in Environment Transcending Times , Settings , and Groups. Handbook of Japan-United States Environment Behavior Research, 1997.

Vidal, Diogo Guedes, Cláudia Oliveira Fernandes, Ricardo Cunha Dias, Paulo Castro Seixas, Nelson Barros, Helena Vilaça, and Rui Leandro Maia. “Os Jardins Da Cidade Um Olhar Sociológico Sobre o Mapeamento Do Comportamento Humano Dos Utilizadores Do Jardim Da Corujeira”. Sociologia: Revista Da Faculdade de Letras Da Universidade Do Porto. 43 (2022): 5-30. https://doi.org/10.21747/08723419/soc43a1

Wang, Hui, Mei Po Kwan, and Mingxing Hu. “Social Exclusion and Accessibility among Low- and Non-Low-Income Groups: A Case Study of Nanjing, China”. Journal of Cities, no. 101 (March 2020): 102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102684

Weiss, Matthias and Martin Hoegl. “Effects of Relative Team Size on Teams with Innovative Tasks: An Understaffing Theory Perspective”. Organizational Psychology Review, vol. 6, no. 4 (2016): 324-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386615620837.

Wicker, Allan W. “Perspectives on Behavior Settings: With Illustrations from Allison’s Ethnography of a Japanese Hostess Club”. Environment and Behavior, vol. 44, no. 4 (2012): 474-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511398374.

Yousefi, Ali. “On Social Bordering of Urban Spaces in Mashhad: Classifying the Districts Based on the Residents’ Social Status”. Journal of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, no. 2 (2009): 61-91. https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v0i0.8770 (In Persian).

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.307379,59.6649864,365m