The Application of Environmental Preferences Criteria in Public Space Assessment, with an Emphasis on the Sense of Place

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran

Abstract

Influenced by cognitive approach in environmental psychology, the concept of environmental preferences proposes frameworks and general criteria to analyse the preferability of the space in people’s judgement. These criteria refer to qualities of desirable environments. However, the phenomenological approach asserts real, lived experience of an individual and his or her expectations and interpretations as the most important. The present research examines these criteria and concepts in an urban space, using environmental preferences measurement criteria on one hand, and the concept of the sense of place on the other. To do so, the assessment of Quds Street’s desirability for the University of Tehran students has been used as the basis. Field studies have been conducted in two stages and compared with each other. In the first stage Quds Street was assessed by a group of 20 trained urban design students, based on environmental preferences criteria. In the second, a series of interviews were conducted using ‘go-along with’ method, to study the sense of place in 25 students from the University of Tehran. Interviews were then analysed using qualitative content analysis. A comparison between the findings of the above two stages shows that the concept of the sense of place can help experts accurately find how preferable an urban space is.

Keywords

References

پاکزاد، جهانشاه و شمین گلرخ. «فهم تجربة تغییر یکبارة مکان؛ حس مکان ساکنان و کسبة خیابان پیاده‌راه‌شدة 17 شهریور»، در نشریة علمی‌ـ پژوهشی صفه، ش 70 (پاییز 1394)، ص 65-80.
 
Altman, Irwin & Setha M. Low. Place Attachment (Human Behavior and Environment), Springer, 1992.
Appleyard, Donald. Planning a Pluralist City: Conflicting Realities in Ciudad Guayana, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1976.
Bergeron, Julie, et al. “Uncovering Landscape Values and Micro-geographies of Meanings with the Go-along Method”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, 122 (2014), pp. 108-121.
Berlyne, D.E. Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
Bonaiuto, Marino & Ferdinando Fornara & Mirilia Bonnes. “Indexes of Perceived Residential Environment Quality and Neighbourhood Attachment in Urban Environments: a Confirmation Study on the City of Rome”, in Landscape and Urban Planning , 65 (2003), pp. 41-52.
Canter, David. The Psychology of Place,London: the architectural press, 1977.
Carpiano, Richard M. “Come Take a Walk with Me: The Go-Along Interview as a Novel Method for Studying the Implications of Place for Health and Well-being”, in Health & Place, 15 (2009), pp. 263-272
Erlingsson, Christen & Petra Brysiewicz. “A Hands-on Guide to Doing Content Analysis”, in African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3) (2017), pp. 93-99.
Elo, Satu, et al. “Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness”, in SAGE Open, 4(1) (2014), pp. 1-10
Epstein, Seymour. “The Self-Concept Revisited”, in American Psychologist, 28 (1973), pp. 404-414.
Galindo, M Paz & José Antonio Corraliza Rodríguez. “Environmental Aesthetics and Psychological Wellbeing: Relationships between Preference Judgments for Urban Landscapes and other Relevant Affective Responses”, in Psychology in Spain, 4(1) (2000), pp. 13-27.
Galindo, M Paz & M. Carmen Hidalgo. “Aesthetic Preferences and the Attribution of Meaning: Environmental Categorization Processes in the Evaluation of Urban Scenes”, in International Journal of Psychology, 40(1) (2005), pp. 19-26.
Genereux, Randy L. &, Lawrence M. Ward & James A. Russell. “The Behavioral Component in the Meaning of Places”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3 (1983), pp. 43-55.
Gifford, Robert (ed.). Research Methods for Environmental Psychology, UK: WILEY, 2016.
Golledge, R.G. “An Anchor Point Theory of the Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge and some Empirical Observations”, in Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Association of American Geographers, Washington D.C., 1984.
________ . “Environmental Cognition”, in D. Stokols, I. Altman and E. Willems (eds), Handbook of Environmental Psychology, New York: John Wiley, 1985.
________ . “Learning about Urban Environments”, in T. Carlstein, D. Parkes and N. Thrift (eds), Timing Space and Spacing Time, London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
Graneheim, U.H. & B. Lundman. “Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness”, in Nurse Educ. Today, 24(2) (2004), pp. 105-112.
Graneheim, Ulla H., et al. “Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Content Analysis: A Discussion Paper”, in Nurse Education Today, 56 (2017), pp. 29-34
Hanyu, Kazanori. “Visual Properties and Affective Appraisals in Residential Areas after Dark”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17 (1997), pp. 301-315.
________ . “Visual Properties and Affective Appraisals in Residential Areas in Daylight”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20 (2000), pp. 273-284.
Hartig, Terry, et al. “A Measure of Restorative Quality in Environment”, in Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 14 (1997), pp. 175-194.
Hernandez, Bernardo, et.al. “Place Attachment and Place Identity in Natives and Non-natives”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27 (2007), pp. 310-319.
Herzog, Thomas R. “A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Urban Spaces”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12 (1992), pp. 237-248.
Hidalgo, M.C. & B. Hernandez. “Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21 (2001), pp. 273–281.
Jorgensen, Bradley S. “Subjective Mapping Methodologies for Incorporating Spatial Variation in research on Social Capital and Sense of Place”, in Journal of Economic and Social Geography,101(5) (2010), pp. 554-567.
Jorgensen, Bradley & Richard C. Stedman. “Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitude toward Their Properties”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21 (2001), pp. 233-248.
Kaplan, Stephen. “Perception and Landscape: Conceptions and Misconceptions”, in Elsner, Gary H., and Richard C. Smardon, Technical Coordinators, Proceedings of our National Landscape: a Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource, Berkeley, CA. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1979, pp. 241-248.
Kaplan, R. & S. Kaplan. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989
Kaplan, R., et al. “Environmental Preference: a Comparison of four Domains of Predictors”, in Environment and Behavior, 21 (1989), pp. 509-530.
Kaplan, S. “An Informal Model for the Prediction of Preference”, in E. H. Zube, et al (eds.), Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions, and Resources. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1975, pp. 92-101.
Kaplan, Stephen. “The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Towards an Integrative Framework”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15 (1995), pp. 169-182.
Kaplan, Stephen. “The Restorative Environment: Nature and Human Experience”, in Relf, Diane (ed.), The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development, Portland, Oregon: Timber Press, 1992, pp. 134-142.
Korpela, K.M. “Place-identity as a Product of Environmental Self-regulation”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9 (1989), pp. 241-256.
Korpela, K.M & Terry Hartig. “Restorative Qualities of Favorite Places”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16 (1996), pp. 221-233
Kusenbach, Margarethe. “Street Phenomenology; The Go-along as Ethnographic Research Tool”, in Ethnography, 4 (2003), pp. 455-485.
Kyle, Gerard T., et al. “Linking Place Preferences with Place Meaning: An Examination of the Relationship between Place Motivation and Place Attachment”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (2004), pp. 439-454.
Lewicka, Maria. “Place Attachment: How far Have We Come in the Last 40 years?”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (2004), pp. 117-130.
Lim, Miyoun & Angela Calabrese Barton. “Exploring in Urban Children’s Sense of Place”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3) (2010), pp. 1-24.
Lynch, Kevin. The Image of the City, Cambridge: the MIT Press, 1960.
Nasar, Jack L. “New Development in Aesthetics for Urban Design”, in G. T. Moore & R.W. Marans (eds.), Advances in Environment, Behavior and Design,Vol.4, New York: Plenum Press, 1997, pp. 149-193.
________ . “Urban Design Aesthetics, The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors”, in Environmen and Behavior, 26 (1994), pp. 377-401.
________ . The Evaluative Image of the City, SAGE, 1998.
Osgood, C.E., et al. Measure of Meaning, Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1957.
Proshansky, Harold M. “The City and Self Identity”, in Environment and Behavior, 10 (1978), pp. 147-169.
Russell, James A. “A Circumplex Model of Affect”, in Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 39(6) (1980), pp. 1161-1178.
________ . “Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion”, in Psychological Review, 110(1) (2003), pp. 145-172.
________ . “Emotion, Core Affect, and Psychological Construction”, in COGNITION AND EMOTION, 23 (7) (2009), pp. 1259-1283.
Russell, James A. & Maria Lewicka. “A Cross-Cultural Study of a Circumplex Model of Affect”, in Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 57(5) (1989), pp. 848-856.
Sepe, Marichela. “Creating Sustainable Urban Landscapes; Mapping with Placemaker”, in International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 2(2) (2007), pp. 187-204.
Sepe, Marichela. “PlaceMaker Method: Planning ‘Walkability’ by Mapping Place Identity”, in Journal of Urban Design, 14(4) (2009), pp. 463-487.
Stamps, Arthur E. “Mystery, Complexity, Legibility and Coherence: A Meta- analysis”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (2004), pp. 1-6.
Stedman, Richard. “Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes toward Their Properties”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21 (2001), pp. 233-248.
Stokols, D & S.A. Shumakher. “People in Places: A Transactional View of Settings”, in Harvey, J. (ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior and the Environment, NJ, Erlbaum, 1981.
Travlou, Penny, et al. “Place Mapping with Teenagers: Locating Their Territories and Documenting Their Experience of the Public Realm”, in Children’s Geographies, 6(3) (2008), pp. 309-326.
Tu, Kung-Jen & Li-Ting Lin. “Evaluative Structure of Perceived Residential Environment Quality in High-density and Mixed-use Urban Settings: An Exploratory Study on Taipei City”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(3) (2008), pp. 157-171.
Twigger-Ross, Clare, et al. “Identity Theories and Environmental Psychology”, in Bonnes, Mirilia, et al (eds), Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, ASHGATE, 2003, pp. 203-233.
Uzzell, David. “Environmental Psychological Perspective on Landscape”, in Landscape Research, 16(1) (2007), pp. 3-10.
Wood, Denis & Robert Beck. “Talking With Maps: Environmental A, An Experimental Mapping Language,” in Gary Moore & Reginald Golledge (eds.), Environmental Knowing, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, Dowden: Hutchinson and Ross, 1976, pp. 351-361.
Zhang, Heng & Shih-Hsien Lin. “Affective Appraisal of Residents and Visual Elements in the Neighborhood: A Case Study in an Established SubUrban Community”, in Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(2011), pp. 11-21.
Zube, Ervin H., et al. “Landscape Perception; Research, Application and Theory”, in Landscape Planning, 9(1) (1982), pp. 1-33.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 September 2019
  • Revise Date: 24 January 2021
  • Accept Date: 31 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics