Assessing Community Resilience in Urban Disaster Management

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modarres University

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

A resilient Community is a local community that can shortly restore its pre-disaster status drawing on its internal potentials and effectively utilizing external assistance. Based on the idea that during disasters, the physical structure should act together with the social content, this concept emphasizes on local community empowerment and effective local government supervision. For an effective mitigation, reducing risks for physical elements of a society should be accompanied by increasing social carrying capacity thresholds. The main five factors in an urban resilient community include management and monitoring, risk assessment, education and training, disaster mitigation, and risk preparedness. This paper presents the results of a community resilience assessment in District 17, Tehran Municipality. Research method includes direct observation and household surveys covering the main five factors of resilience. The statistical analysis of the results indicates a low level of resilience which could be enhanced by undertaking a series of recommended measures.

  1. منابع و مآخذ
  2. خورشید، کامبیز. « تحلیل ساختار مدیریت بحران ایالات متحده آمریکا» . در مجموعه مقالات دومین کنفرانس بین المللى مدیریت جامع بحران در حوادث غیر مترقبة طبیعى: تهران. 24-25 بهمن ماه 1385 ، دانشگاه تهران. تهران: دانشگاه تهران، بهمن 1385 ، ص 5-15.
  3. درابک، توماس اى و جرالد جى هواتمر. مدیریت بحران اصول و راهنماى دولت هاى محلى. ترجمة مرکز مطالعات و برنامه ریزى شهر تهران. تهران: پردازش و برنامه ریزى شهرى (وابسته به شهردارى تهران)، 1383.
  4. عسگرى، على. اجتماعات مقاوم. سخنرانى در جامعة مهندسان مشاور ایران: تهران. تهران، 1386.
  5. Buckle, P. “Re-defining community and vulnerability in the context of emergency management“. in Australia Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 13, part 4, (1998), pp. 21-26.
  6. Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A. and Schiller, A. "Aframework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science". in PNAS,100 (14), (2003a), 74-80
  7. Evansvill, I. To Develop a Model Disaster Resistant Community Program. 1997.
  8. Holling, C. S., Schindler, D. W., Walker, B. W. and Roughgarden, J. "Biodiversity in the functioning of ecosystems: an ecological synthesis". in Prrings, C., Maler, K. G., Folke, C., Holling C. S. and Jansson, B. O. (eds.) Biodiveristy loss: economic and ecological issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 44-83.
  9. Mileti, D. m. Disaster by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazard in the United State. Washingtoon DC: Joseph Henry Press, 1999.
  10. Pelling, mark. “Vulnerability Reduction and the Community-based Approach". in Ntural Disaster, vol. 1, part 4, (2003), pp. 170-184.
  11. Pimm, S. L. “The Complexity and Stability of Reliance Ecosystems”. in Nature, 307, (1984), pp. 321-326.
  12. Twigg, J. Characteristics of a Disaster-resilient Community A Guidance Note., Version 1 (for field testing), for the DFID Disaster Risk Reduction Interagency Coordination Group. (August 2007) pp. 5-20.
  13. UNISDR (United Nation International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction) Hyogo Framework for 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. 2005, pp. 11-14. www.unisdr.org/wcdr/intergover/officialdoc/ Hyogo-framework-for-action-english.pdf. Accessed on 22 June 2005.