<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Shahid Beheshti University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Soffeh</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1683-870X</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Ideation versus Idea Processing in Architectural Design Thinking</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Ideation versus Idea Processing in Architectural Design Thinking</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>19</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>26</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">100209</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamid Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sharif</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-9248-3569</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nadimi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-7053-4022</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span style=&quot;color: black; font-family: &#039;Calibri Light&#039;; font-size: large;&quot;&gt;Recent design research implies that the design process includes two key intellectual sub-processes: ideation, i.e. finding or generating ideas based on an investigation of the design problem and idea processing which includes evaluation and selection of an optimal idea as the solution. This paper attempts to examine the relationship between these two intellectual processes drawing on recent findings in cognitive psychology.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;color: black; font-family: &#039;Calibri Light&#039;; font-size: large;&quot;&gt;It is concluded that both processes include ‘analyses’. Yet the differences is that in ideation, the analysis focuses on the problem, while in idea processing its emphasis is on the solution. Analysis is also employed for a constant review of the design process, per se.&lt;/span&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;span style=&quot;color: black; font-family: &#039;Calibri Light&#039;; font-size: large;&quot;&gt;Recent design research implies that the design process includes two key intellectual sub-processes: ideation, i.e. finding or generating ideas based on an investigation of the design problem and idea processing which includes evaluation and selection of an optimal idea as the solution. This paper attempts to examine the relationship between these two intellectual processes drawing on recent findings in cognitive psychology.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;color: black; font-family: &#039;Calibri Light&#039;; font-size: large;&quot;&gt;It is concluded that both processes include ‘analyses’. Yet the differences is that in ideation, the analysis focuses on the problem, while in idea processing its emphasis is on the solution. Analysis is also employed for a constant review of the design process, per se.&lt;/span&gt;</OtherAbstract>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100209_a2c69b11f073b29ec8efc6b27af590c9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
